CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

grill-me

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

65

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-built instructional skill body: lean, concrete, and sequenced, with executable script hooks and a precise per-question output template. The main gaps are missing argument details in workflow commands, no explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoints, and two of three reference files left unlinked from the entry point.

Suggestions

Link references/forcing_question_patterns.md and references/when_to_stop_grilling.md from SKILL.md (e.g., in the Tooling or Rules section) so all bundle references are discoverable from the entry point.

Show argument syntax for the script invocations, e.g. `python scripts/decision_tree_extractor.py <plan.md>` and the tracker's `start <session_name>`, so the workflow steps are copy-paste executable.

Add an explicit checkpoint after extraction/generation (e.g., what to do when zero branches are found) and a resume path for an interrupted session.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence — five terse rules, a six-step workflow, and a compact output template with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5, because provenance is stated twice (opening blockquote plus the trailing "Version/Derived" footer) and minor editorial padding ("Defaulting to 'what do you think?' is lazy.", "Saves a turn.") could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, runnable commands are given ("Run scripts/decision_tree_extractor.py", "scripts/grill_session_tracker.py --action start") plus an exact output pattern template, and all referenced scripts exist in the bundle. Not 5, because the invocations are not copy-paste ready — no argument syntax is shown for passing the plan doc to the extractor or generator, and the tracker's session-name argument is omitted.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The six-step sequence (provide plan → extract branches → generate questions → start session → walk tree recording answers → report) is clearly ordered with an explicit terminal condition ("When all branches resolved"). Not 5, because there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error-recovery loops — e.g., what to do if the extractor finds no branches or the session needs resuming mid-grill.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is decent: the overview stays in SKILL.md and tooling detail is offloaded to a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ([references/companion_tooling.md]). But scored against the actual bundle, two of the three reference files (forcing_question_patterns.md, when_to_stop_grilling.md) are never mentioned anywhere in SKILL.md or the linked reference, leaving them buried and undiscoverable. Not 4, because unreferenced bundle files are more than a minor organization gap.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person, concise, with an explicit 'Use when' clause and a distinctive natural trigger ("grill me"). The 'what' and 'when' are both answered clearly; the only weakness is modest keyword coverage and slight overlap risk with generic plan-review skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Interview the user relentlessly" and "resolving each branch of the decision tree" list several specific actions (interview, resolve branches, reach shared understanding) with only minor coverage gaps — recommended-answer discipline and codebase exploration are in the body but not the description. Not 3, because more than 1-2 concrete actions are named; not 5, because the action set is not comprehensive for what the skill actually does.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly answers both: what ("Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree") and when ("Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions 'grill me'"), with the explicit 'Use when' clause and a concrete trigger phrase.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"stress-test a plan", "get grilled on their design", and "grill me" are natural phrases a user would actually say. Not 5, because common synonyms like "interrogate me", "challenge my design", or "poke holes in my plan" are missing; not 3, because coverage goes beyond a couple of generic keywords.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"grill me" and "get grilled on their design" carve out a distinct interview/interrogation niche unlikely to fire for document- or code-processing skills. Not 5, because "stress-test a plan" and "plan"/"design" are broad words with minor overlap risk against generic plan-review or feedback skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Path

engineering/grill-me/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.