Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with strong progressive disclosure and explicit validation checkpoints for a save-and-load workflow. The main weakness is redundancy — trigger phrases and slash commands repeat content already in the description and other sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the Invocation Triggers section: the explicit phrases already appear verbatim in the description; keep only the new implicit-signal proposal guidance ('Want me to write a handoff...') to remove duplication.
Merge the Usage table with the Slash Commands section, or replace one with a cross-reference, to avoid restating the same commands twice.
Add a single short numbered 'Workflow' summary at the top (detect → setup → scaffold → fill → self-check → linter → save) so the end-to-end sequence is legible in one place before the detailed sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of concept over-explanation, but the Invocation Triggers and Usage sections duplicate phrases already in the description and Slash Commands section, and the Examples run a bit long — minor trimming would tighten it. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (mktemp fallback, --refresh invocation, env-var toggles, slash commands) and a tools table with purposes, with only minor gaps in showing every script invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced flow (detect trigger → setup → scaffold → fill via mandatory checklist → self-check → redaction linter → save) with explicit validation checkpoints (self-check before linter, linter blocks save in strict mode); the only gap is that the end-to-end order is distributed across sections rather than one consolidated ordered list. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (configuration.md, handoff_structure.md, handoff_prompt.md, deduplication_discipline.md, redaction_checklist.md, assets/example_handoff.md) — all verified to exist — with content appropriately split across references, scripts, and assets. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |