Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with a real validation checkpoint. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it references reference and script files that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced files (references/examples-bank.md, references/interview-to-config.md, and the scripts/interview_planner.py, build_sheet_builder.py, primitives_validator.py) so the signaled navigation resolves to real artifacts.
If any referenced file is not yet authored, either inline the essential content or mark the reference as a stub so Claude is not left following dead links.
Consider consolidating the examples-bank reference into the body if it is small, to reduce reliance on a missing file for the warm-open step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what an agent or an interview is — and uses compact tables and inline commands so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Three fully executable bash commands with concrete arguments (interview_planner.py, build_sheet_builder.py, primitives_validator.py) and a forcing-question library with explicit recommendations and citations provide copy-paste-ready guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A five-step numbered workflow includes an explicit validation checkpoint (step 4: 'FAIL blocks progress; fix and re-run. WARN is advisory') with a feedback loop, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body signals one-level-deep references (examples-bank.md, interview-to-config.md) and scripts cleanly, but the referenced references/ and scripts/ bundle directories are absent, so the navigation points to files that do not exist. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |