Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview with genuinely actionable matrices, checklists, and a clear decision sequence, supported by two appropriate one-level-deep reference files. It consistently lands at 'good with minor gaps': redundant keyword duplication, implicit rather than explicit decision checkpoints, and end-only reference placement.
Suggestions
Remove the "Keywords" section (or fold any missing synonyms into the frontmatter description) — it duplicates trigger terms already present in the description and spends tokens on nothing new.
Make the decision-sequence checkpoints explicit gates, e.g. "advance Export → Partnership when the market shows >$X ARR or N repeat customers" so the entry-mode graduation path has a stated criterion rather than 'as revenue justifies'.
Surface the reference files where they're used, not only in the closing Resources section — e.g. link references/regional-guide.md from a short "Regional considerations" line, so navigation happens at the point of need.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is table- and checklist-driven, assumes Claude's business knowledge, and contains no padded concept explanations; the "Keywords" section duplicates trigger terms already in the frontmatter description, which is the main token inefficiency keeping it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: a weighted scoring matrix ("Market size (addressable) 25%..."), an entry-mode comparison with a default graduation path ("Export → Partnership → Local team → Entity (graduate as revenue justifies)"), and mistake/prevention pairs. It stops short of a 5 because there are no thresholds or a worked example showing how to apply the scoring matrix to a decision. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "Market selection → Entry mode → Regulatory assessment → Localization plan → GTM strategy → Team structure → Launch" gives a clear decision sequence whose stages map to the body sections in order, and Key Questions act as implicit checkpoints. Checkpoints remain implicit rather than explicit gates (e.g., no stated criterion for graduating between entry modes), so it fits the anchor-4 'most checkpoints present' level. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Resources section clearly signals two real, one-level-deep reference files with descriptions ("references/market-entry-playbook.md — detailed entry playbook by market type"), and the body stays an overview rather than inlining deep detail. The minor gap is that references appear only in a terminal section instead of being surfaced where relevant (e.g., the regional guide has no corresponding in-body pointer), fitting anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |