Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes domain competence — the ORB and phase models are genuinely non-obvious frameworks delivered as tight bullets and tables. Minor trimming opportunities exist: the all-three-channels quality bar is stated twice (Core Philosophy and Communication), and the role-play opener and some task questions add padding. This matches 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed.'

Actionability

Guidance is a mix: the readiness scorer has a concrete invocation (`python3 scripts/launch_readiness_scorer.py --checklist launch.json` with flags) and the artifacts table specifies formats, but no example output, checklist items, or copy frameworks are provided — full detail is deferred to references that don't exist, and the one concrete command points to a script that isn't in the bundle. This matches 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete.'

Workflow Clarity

The phase model (pre-launch → launch day → post-launch) provides sequencing and the Tools section includes one real checkpoint (score at planning start and one week out; slip the date if below passing), but there is no explicit end-to-end workflow connecting Before Starting → questions → frameworks → artifacts. Sequence is implicit in section order with no stated error-recovery steps, matching 'Steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit.'

Progressive Disclosure

The body defers 'full treatment' to references/launch-frameworks-and-checklists.md and invokes scripts/launch_readiness_scorer.py, but the bundle contains no references/ or scripts/ directories at all — both paths are dangling, so navigation fails entirely. The in-body structure is well-sectioned, but references that point to nonexistent files match 'Minimal structure... or references are buried' territory rather than the good-structure anchors.

Specificity

The description names the domain and one concrete action ("plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy"), but the remainder is topical coverage ("covers phased launches, channel strategy, and ongoing launch momentum") rather than a list of distinct concrete actions. It matches the anchor 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive' — it does not list several specific actions like the score-4 example does.

Completeness

The 'when' is fully explicit with concrete trigger phrases ("When the user wants to plan... Also use when the user mentions..."), exceeding the score-4 anchor's when-clause. However, the 'what' ("This skill covers phased launches, channel strategy, and ongoing launch momentum") is a topical scope statement rather than the concrete action enumeration in the score-5 example, so it falls between anchors 4 and 5.

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger coverage with synonyms: 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'feature release,' 'announcement,' 'go-to-market,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'product update,' 'GTM plan,' 'launch checklist,' 'launch momentum.' These are phrases a user would naturally say, including synonym pairs (go-to-market / GTM plan), matching the 'comprehensive coverage of natural terms including synonyms' anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The product-launch niche is clear with distinct triggers ('Product Hunt,' 'beta launch,' 'launch checklist'), but broad terms like 'announcement' and 'product update' carry minor overlap risk with closely related marketing skills (e.g., the email-sequence and content-strategy skills it itself references). This matches 'Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills.'