Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, action-oriented launch-planning skill with a clear phased workflow and an explicit readiness-gate validation loop. Its main defect is that the body references a frameworks file and a scorer script that are not present in the bundle, breaking progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files: create references/launch-frameworks-and-checklists.md and scripts/launch_readiness_scorer.py so the 'full treatment' and readiness-scorer references actually resolve.
De-duplicate the ORB quality bar: state 'covers all three ORB channel types plus launch-day and post-launch actions' once (Communication) instead of repeating it in Core Philosophy.
Trim the editorializing in 'A launch is a momentum system, not a day' to a plain framing of the two models to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — tables and tight bullets, and the ORB/phase frameworks are domain-specific knowledge Claude lacks, so explaining them is justified — but the ORB quality bar is stated twice (Core Philosophy and Communication) and 'A launch is a momentum system, not a day' is mild editorializing, so it is 'efficient with minor over-explanation' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place level. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete executable command ('python3 scripts/launch_readiness_scorer.py --checklist launch.json') with flags, plus concrete task questions, trigger conditions, and an artifacts table; it is not 5 because the bulk is strategic planning guidance rather than copy-paste-ready code covering common cases, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-phase sequence (Pre-launch → Launch day → Post-launch) with timeframes plus an explicit validation gate ('score the checklist when planning starts and again one week out — launching below a passing score... means slipping the date, not hoping') provides the feedback loop and checkpoint the top anchor requires; this is a planning skill, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and signaling are good — clear sections and one-level-deep references ('full treatment in references/launch-frameworks-and-checklists.md') — but no bundle directories exist, so both referenced files (the frameworks reference and the scorer script) are missing and the references do not resolve, capping it at 'some structure; references present but not reliably navigable' rather than the well-placed level above. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |