Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured orchestrator: deterministic routing table, hard refusal gates, and a step-by-step workflow with real commands. Its weaknesses are execution-irrelevant background material (essay recap, canon citations, redundant distinctness section) and a final handoff step that stops short of an executable renderer command or output verification.
Suggestions
Trim the opening Shihipar essay recap, the per-question 'Canon:' citations in the forcing-question library, and the 'Distinct from' section (already covered in the description); move the canon list to a single references line.
Add the concrete renderer invocation command to Step 5 (input markdown, design-system config, resolved output path) so the handoff is copy-paste executable like the other steps.
Add a final output-verification step (e.g., check the HTML file was written and opens/self-contains no missing assets) to close the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, but the opening Shihipar essay recap, the forcing-question library with per-question 'Canon:' citations (Tufte, Matt Pocock), and the 'Distinct from' section (which repeats the description's disambiguation) are background Claude doesn't need to execute. Mostly efficient but several sections could be tightened or moved out of the execution path. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands with full paths for the classifier pipeline, route_explainer with enumerated verdicts (ROUTE_SILENTLY / ASK_USER / REFUSE), and output_path_resolver with collision flags, plus a point-scored routing signal table. Minor gap: Step 5 names the renderer directories but provides no executable invocation command for the sub-skill handoff. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with commands at each, and pre-flight gates act as explicit validation checkpoints (refusals for <100 lines, missing onboarding, unwritable output). Non-destructive one-shot conversion with collision suffixing, so the destructive/batch cap doesn't apply; the gap is the absence of any verification of the produced HTML. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned overview with one-level-deep references to external skill scripts given as concrete paths (no nested reference chains, no bundle files to misorganize). Content that could live in a separate file — the forcing-question library and the canon references — is inlined in the SKILL.md body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |