Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured curation skill: lean, table-driven body with the idea library correctly offloaded to a single verified reference file and a concrete output contract. The main improvements are folding the ask-before-recommending checkpoint into the workflow, adding one worked example, and trimming redundant cross-index sections.
Suggestions
Add one worked example (a single idea rendered through the Output Format template) so the expected deliverable shape is unambiguous.
Move the 'ask before recommending if stage or budget is unclear' rule from the Communication section into the numbered workflow as an explicit decision step between step 1 and step 2.
Consolidate the By Stage / By Budget / By Timeline quick-reference sections into references/ideas-by-category.md (or a single combined matrix) to reduce redundant cross-indexing in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is table- and index-driven with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but it maintains five overlapping cross-indexes of the same 139 ideas (category table, by stage, by budget, by timeline, by use case) that could be consolidated. Matches anchor 4 (efficient with minor trims) rather than 5, since not every section earns its place, and well above 3's 'some unnecessary explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: a specific output template ("Idea name / Why it fits / How to start / Expected outcome / Resources needed"), a numbered 4-step workflow, specific diagnostic questions, and actionable proactive triggers with redirects. It stops short of anchor 5 because there is no worked example applying the output template, and recommendations lean on idea numbers that resolve only in the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence ("1. Ask about their product... 2. Suggest 3-5 most relevant ideas...") with a precondition check for .claude/product-marketing-context.md. It is not 5 because the key checkpoint — "If stage or budget is unclear, ask before recommending" — lives in the Communication section rather than being an explicit step with a decision point inside the workflow itself. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Exactly the anchor-5 pattern: a concise overview with quick indexes inline, and the bulk detail (all 139 idea descriptions) in a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference — "For the complete list with descriptions: See [references/ideas-by-category.md]", which exists as a real 347-line bundle file. No nested references, no buried content. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |