Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable, with a clean progressive-disclosure pattern that keeps the overview lean while pushing the 70+ model catalog to a single real reference file. Its main weakness is token redundancy from three overlapping model-listing sections and mild re-explanation of commonly known concepts.
Suggestions
Consolidate the three overlapping model lists (Categories at a Glance, Most-Used Models, Quick Reference) into one, or move the full inventory entirely to the catalog reference to reduce redundancy and token cost.
Trim definitional restatements of widely known concepts (e.g. 'People feel losses 2x more than gains') and keep only the marketing-application directive.
Tie the Communication self-verify step into an explicit ordered workflow (e.g. diagnose → apply → produce → verify) so the validation checkpoint is a visible feedback loop rather than a standalone section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and marketing-specific, but it lists overlapping model inventories in three places (Categories at a Glance, Most-Used Models, Quick Reference) and briefly re-explains widely known concepts ('People feel losses 2x more than gains'). Anchor 3 fits because it could be tightened; not a 4 because the redundancy across three tables exceeds 'minor' over-explanation. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and actionable for an instruction-only skill, e.g. 'Show higher price first, then your price', 'Under $100: show % discount. Over $100: show $ discount', and Proactive Triggers pair a detection cue with a specific fix. Anchor 4 fits with minor gaps; not a 5 because some listed models lack an equally concrete application example in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear operational flow is present — Before Starting context check, three named modes, Task-Specific Questions, Output Artifacts, and an explicit self-verify checkpoint in the Communication section ('source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring'). Anchor 4 fits with most checkpoints present; not a 5 because the self-verify loop is not tied into a crisp numbered feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a single well-signaled one-level-deep reference — 'The full catalog lives in [references/mental-models-catalog.md]... Load it when you need to look up specific models' — and the referenced file exists and holds the bulk (72 models). Matches the anchor 5 example of a clear overview with appropriately split, easy-to-navigate references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |