Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-executed command skill: concrete intake questions, a complete output schema with explicit placeholder format, a sequenced workflow with a built-in validation step, and clear ownership rules that prevent divergent context files. Its weaknesses are minor — slight redundancy between the intro and 'What This Produces' sections, and a referenced llm-wiki-bridge.md file that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Verify or fix the ../../references/llm-wiki-bridge.md link (referenced in Persistence and Related) — no references/ directory ships with this skill, so the link is currently dangling and the persistence option it documents is unreachable.
Trim the overlap between the opening paragraph and the 'What This Produces' section (both state the output file and its consumers), letting one carry the full detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and almost entirely project-specific knowledge (12 questions, template, workflow, re-run triggers), with only minor trims available — e.g. the opening paragraph restates the artifact and its consumers already covered by 'What This Produces', and the description's content is repeated in the intro. This matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete guidance: 12 numbered questions with enumerated answer options, a complete output template with explicit placeholders and save path, and a copy-paste bash command for the optional vault symlink — matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow is a clear 5-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint and feedback loop ('read the file back, ask "anything missing?"') plus the 12-question checklist, matching the top anchor; this is a non-destructive single-session interview, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized with a Related section and clearly signaled one-level references, but the body links ../../references/llm-wiki-bridge.md (in both Persistence and Related) while no references/ directory exists in the bundle, leaving that relative path dangling — matching 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |