Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured, with specific intake questions and a copy-paste output template. Its main weaknesses are a slightly long schema-mapping paragraph and external references that are signaled but not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Tighten the Output Format prose: the schema-mapping sentence ("Identity/Business/Financial → Stage & Scale, Team → Team & Culture, Quarter priorities/risks → Current Challenges + Goals & Ambition") largely duplicates the template; keep one or the other.
Add an explicit error-recovery note to the workflow (e.g., what to do if the founder's answers are incomplete or contradict prior context) to push workflow clarity toward 5.
Verify the cross-skill reference paths (../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cs-onboard/..., ../../references/llm-wiki-bridge.md) resolve in the installed plugin, or note that cs-onboard is a prerequisite dependency up front.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding explaining ARR, runway, or what a founder interview is); the output template earns its tokens, though the prose schema-mapping paragraph plus the full template carry minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Twelve questions each specify exact fields (ACV median/range, deal count LTM, runway base/bear), the output template is copy-paste ready, and the workflow includes a concrete `ln -sf` command — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit read-back validation checkpoint ("read the file back, ask 'anything missing?'") is present, but there is no error-recovery branch, so it falls short of the feedback-loop-rich anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and cross-skill references (cs-onboard, llm-wiki-bridge) are one-level-deep and clearly signaled via markdown links, but those referenced paths are absent from this skill's bundle, a minor organization gap that keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |