Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable skill body: concrete intake questions, an exact output schema template, a sequenced workflow with a read-back confirmation step, and clear re-run triggers. The main gaps are mild motivational redundancy, a missing explicit feedback loop after the confirmation step, and cross-references that resolve only inside the parent repository rather than within the skill's own bundle.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop to the Workflow: after step 5's read-back, instruct what to do when the founder flags something missing (e.g. capture it in the matching schema section, or fall back to the full cs-onboard interview) — this would lift workflow_clarity to 5.
Make the cross-references resolvable within the skill's own bundle: either copy the 7-dimension schema summary or the llm-wiki-bridge reference into a local references/ file, or reference them by skill/command name instead of fragile ../../../ relative paths.
Trim the redundant framing — "Without this, the advisors are guessing" and the prose paragraph in Output Format overlap with the description and the template — to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 12 questions are terse, the template defines the output format with no padding, and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. Small trimmable instances remain — "Without this, the advisors are guessing" re-motivates what the description already established, and the Output Format prose paragraph partially duplicates the template that follows it — matching the 4 anchor (efficient with minor over-explanation) rather than the every-token-earns-its-place 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: 12 enumerated questions with option lists ("pre-seed / seed / Series A / Series B / Series C+ / public"), an exact save path, a complete copy-paste output template, and a runnable command ("ln -sf ~/company-vault/00-meta/company-context.md ~/.claude/company-context.md"). Specific and complete for the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps ending in an explicit validation checkpoint ("read the file back, ask 'anything missing?'") plus a defined completion rule ("Write [not captured] for dimensions the quick intake doesn't reach... run the full cs-onboard interview to fill them"). Falls short of 5 because no feedback loop is spelled out for what to do when the founder says something IS missing after the read-back. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned body (Interview, Output Format, Workflow, When to Re-Run, Persistence, Related) that is appropriately self-contained at this size, with cross-references clearly signaled in a Related section. Not 5: the referenced paths ("../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cs-onboard/SKILL.md", "../../references/llm-wiki-bridge.md") point outside the skill bundle and no references/ directory ships with the skill, so those links will not resolve when the skill is deployed standalone. Not 3: structure and signaling are otherwise good, with no content that should be spun out to separate files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |