org-health-diagnostic

Cross-functional organizational health check combining signals from all C-suite roles. Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale with drill-down recommendations. Use when assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or when user mentions org health, health check, or health dashboard.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

—

The risk profile of this skill

Quality

Content

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and well-structured with concrete thresholds, executable commands, and properly signaled one-level-deep bundle references. The main weakness is workflow clarity: the run-to-drill-down flow is implicit with no explicit numbered steps or validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Add an explicit numbered workflow (e.g., 1. Gather metrics → 2. Run scorer → 3. Review traffic-light dashboard → 4. Drill into red/yellow dimensions → 5. Apply recommended actions) with a checkpoint for confirming metric coverage before scoring.

Trim the Keywords list and shorten the inlined dashboard mock-up, or move the full dashboard template into a reference file to improve token efficiency.

Add a brief validation/feedback note for the drill-down step, e.g. re-score after acting on a red dimension to confirm improvement.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly lean and benchmark-dense without explaining concepts Claude already knows; the punchy intro and metric thresholds earn their tokens. Kept below 5 by the padded Keywords list and the lengthy inlined dashboard mock-up.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides copy-paste-ready CLI commands ("python scripts/health_scorer.py --json"), concrete Green/Yellow/Red thresholds per metric, and a full output template. Specific examples cover the common single-dimension and full-diagnostic cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The sequence (invoke scorer → review traffic-light dashboard → drill into top priorities) is present but implicit rather than numbered, with no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops. Not below 3 because the operation is read-only so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; not 4 because no explicit steps or checkpoints are stated.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Clear overview in SKILL.md with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real bundle files ("references/health-benchmarks.md" for stage weights, "scripts/health_scorer.py" for scoring), and content is appropriately split between overview and reference. Easy to navigate.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it explicitly covers both what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete, natural trigger phrases and a distinct niche. Minor gaps in action specificity and a few missing synonyms keep specificity and trigger_term_quality just below full marks.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions — "combining signals from all C-suite roles", "Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale", "drill-down recommendations" — with only minor coverage gaps. Not a 5 because the actions are somewhat high-level rather than a comprehensive enumerated list.	4 / 5
Completeness	Clearly states what it does ("Cross-functional organizational health check…Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale") and gives an explicit "Use when…" clause with concrete trigger phrases. Matches the anchor that answers both what and when explicitly.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural phrases users would say — "org health, health check, or health dashboard" plus "assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews" — but omits common synonyms like "company health check" or "health scorecard". Not a 5 due to those few missing natural variations.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (org health diagnostic across C-suite roles) with distinct triggers ("org health, health check, or health dashboard") unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Minimal conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: c-level-advisor/skills/org-health-diagnostic/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~13 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.