CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

passive-deal-screener

Screens private investment opportunities from the passive LP (limited-partner) perspective — equity syndications, preferred equity, hard money / bridge funds, and private credit — pasted from any source (an investment platform listing, a direct GP email, raw terms). Produces a deal snapshot, stress-tests returns against public benchmarks, deconstructs the fee stack to a gross-to-net drag, surfaces severity-ranked red flags and missing disclosures, assesses GP alignment, and generates prioritized GP questions with bad-answer signals. Use whenever asked to analyze, evaluate, screen, or review a real-estate or private-market deal, syndication, offering, or investment opportunity — e.g. 'is this deal worth pursuing', 'what should I ask the GP', 'analyze this offering memo'. LP lens only; not operator-side underwriting (acquisition/development/asset-management). For corporate-finance DCF/ratio work use financial-analyst.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is top-tier skill authorship: a lean overview that routes by deal type to one-level-deep references, an adversarial rule set expressed as concrete failure modes rather than generic risk language, and a fully specified 10-section output contract with an explicit self-check before emitting. Time-sensitive figures are confined to the reference snapshots with a LAST_UPDATED stamp rather than inlined. No weaknesses worth a deduction were found under this rubric.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and telegraphic with zero concept explanations — it assumes competence on LP/GP, waterfalls, J-curves, and cap rates — and every line carries an instruction (routing tables, nine one-line skepticism rules, six anti-patterns, ID-cited triggers). Nothing can be cut without losing function, so it sits at anchor 5 rather than anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'.

5 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: the routing table maps each deal type to the exact reference section, flag prefixes, and comparator; the 10-section output schema specifies each section's content; scripts are named with a concrete usage constraint ('pass 0 for undisclosed fees'); and the Artifacts table plus enumerated JSON fields cover the common request cases. The only unshown detail is full script argparse syntax, which the skill's own progressive-disclosure model delegates to the script — consistent with anchor 5's 'specific examples cover the common cases'.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The three-step sequence (Classify & parse → Route by deal type → Analyze & assemble) is clear, with branch tables covering all five deal types, an explicit verdict decision tree ('too little to underwrite the core return story? Then Pass as presented — insufficient disclosure'), and a pre-emit validation checkpoint ('Self-check before emitting: every flag family touched in §§2–3 appears by ID in §5, and every stated pref / waterfall / debt term has its 04 probe cited by ID in §8'). This matches anchor 5's clear sequence with explicit validation and a checklist; the destructive/batch cap does not apply to an analysis-only skill.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a lean process overview, and the five reference files are one level deep, clearly signaled by the routing table's 'Load when / Gives' columns with per-deal-type slices (all five files and both scripts verified to exist). The references/data/ snapshot layer is a provenance chain cited by 05 and the scripts rather than instructional nesting Claude must traverse, so it does not constitute the 2+-level nesting of anchor 1–3 examples.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An exemplary description: it names the perspective and asset classes, enumerates the concrete outputs, provides explicit 'Use whenever' trigger guidance with verbatim example queries, and closes with explicit scope exclusions and a cross-reference to the sibling financial-analyst skill. It is long relative to the good examples but every clause is load-bearing rather than padded, so the verbosity guideline is not triggered. No changes needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists six-plus concrete actions ('Produces a deal snapshot, stress-tests returns against public benchmarks, deconstructs the fee stack to a gross-to-net drag, surfaces severity-ranked red flags and missing disclosures, assesses GP alignment, and generates prioritized GP questions with bad-answer signals') in third-person voice, with comprehensive coverage of the skill's outputs. Matches the anchor-5 example's breadth; there are no minor gaps in coverage that would place it at anchor 4.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: 'what' via the enumerated outputs and 'when' via 'Use whenever asked to analyze, evaluate, screen, or review a real-estate or private-market deal, syndication, offering, or investment opportunity' with concrete example trigger phrases. This is exactly the anchor-5 structure (explicit what + explicit when with trigger phrases); the 'when' clause is fully explicit, not merely present.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Covers four verb synonyms ('analyze, evaluate, screen, or review'), four noun synonyms ('deal, syndication, offering, or investment opportunity'), domain qualifiers ('real-estate or private-market'), and three verbatim example queries ('is this deal worth pursuing', 'what should I ask the GP', 'analyze this offering memo'). This synonym-rich coverage mirrors the anchor-5 pattern; at most one or two niche terms (e.g. 'sponsor') are absent, which does not drop it to anchor 4's 'a few natural terms missing'.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Establishes a clear niche (passive-LP screening of 'equity syndications, preferred equity, hard money / bridge funds, and private credit') and adds explicit negative boundaries — 'LP lens only; not operator-side underwriting' and 'For corporate-finance DCF/ratio work use financial-analyst' — that route overlapping requests to sibling skills. Minimal conflict risk, matching anchor 5 rather than anchor 4's 'minor overlap risk with closely related skills'.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Path

finance/skills/passive-deal-screener/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.