Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable strategy skill with clear modes, concrete tables, and useful verification checkpoints, but it loses points because the referenced bundle files (references/pricing-models.md, references/pricing-page-playbook.md, scripts/pricing_modeler.py) are missing, breaking the progressive-disclosure navigation it promises.
Suggestions
Create the referenced bundle files (references/pricing-models.md, references/pricing-page-playbook.md, scripts/pricing_modeler.py) or remove the links so navigation does not dead-end.
Move the detailed tier feature grids and pricing-page copy/FAQ templates into the references and keep SKILL.md as a tighter overview to reduce inline bulk.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop to the price-increase execution checklist (e.g., re-check churn/downgrade metrics weekly and roll back or adjust if net revenue impact turns negative).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — concrete tables, heuristics, and specific numbers ("40% trial-to-paid", "5-15% churn", "60-90 days notice") with no padding of basics Claude already knows — but the ASCII packaging diagram and a few positioning aphorisms could be trimmed. Not a 5 because a handful of decorative/narrative tokens don't fully earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: literal Van Westendorp survey questions, a tier feature grid, a pricing-page layout spec, and a numbered execution checklist. Not a 5 because the modeling workflow delegates to a referenced script that is not shown inline, leaving a minor gap in executable detail. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three modes are clearly framed and the price-increase flow has a sequenced 7-step Execution Checklist with verification/monitoring ("Monitor for 60 days: Churn rate, downgrade rate, support ticket volume") and a decision gate ("If your net revenue impact is positive, proceed"). Not a 5 because there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the batch customer-impacting operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure and in-context reference signaling are good ("See [references/pricing-models.md] for model deep dives"), but the referenced bundle files and script do not exist — the links are dead ends — and substantial detail that could live in those files is inlined in one monolithic body. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |