CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

quality-manager-qms-iso13485

ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device documentation, and corrective action workflows.

66

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is quality-manager-qms-iso13485 in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Well-structured, actionable QMS guidance with explicit validation checkpoints and useful decision frameworks, undermined by a progressive-disclosure failure: all referenced bundle files (two reference docs and one script) are missing, so the SKILL.md carries content monolithically and its links are dead.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced bundle files (references/qms-process-templates.md, references/iso13485-clause-requirements.md, scripts/qms_audit_checklist.py) or remove the links and inline the essential content directly.

Add explicit error-recovery loops to the workflows (e.g., 'If a Validation checkpoint is not met, return to the relevant step and re-run it') to lift workflow clarity.

Tighten the QMSR-transition and decision-discipline callouts to the minimum needed for safe citation, reducing token weight without losing the regulatory guardrail.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense, table-driven content that assumes Claude's competence (no preamble on what ISO 13485 or sterilization is), but the ~420-line body and verbose callouts (QMSR transition note, decision-discipline block) carry tokens that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Workflows give copy-ready specifics (numbering format "SOP-02-001-01", supplier score thresholds ">80: Approved, 60-80: Conditional", retention periods, finding response times), but the referenced script and reference files do not exist, leaving a gap in executable follow-through.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each workflow is a clearly numbered sequence ending in a bolded "**Validation:**" checkpoint with supporting checklists and a decision tree, but explicit error-recovery feedback loops ("if validation fails, return to step X") are not spelled out.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure and inline reference signaling are good (ToC, "Tools and References" section, one-level-deep links), but every referenced target — references/qms-process-templates.md, references/iso13485-clause-requirements.md, scripts/qms_audit_checklist.py — is absent from the bundle, so navigation resolves to nothing and detailed content is forced inline.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states capabilities and explicit use-conditions with concrete trigger phrases. The only weakness is mild redundancy in the closing "Useful for..." sentence rather than richer synonym coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities — "QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support" — giving comprehensive coverage of the domain's actions rather than vague abstractions.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("ISO 13485 QMS implementation and maintenance...Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support") and when ("Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits...") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when..." clause surfaces natural phrases ("ISO 13485 audits", "corrective actions", "audit preparation", "regulatory compliance documentation"), but the closing sentence largely repeats those terms rather than adding fresh synonyms or variants.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (ISO 13485 medical-device QMS) with distinct, domain-specific triggers, making accidental firing for unrelated skills unlikely.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 6 missing, 5 suspicious

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 6 missing

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.