CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

regulatory-affairs-head

Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Prepares FDA 510(k), De Novo, and PMA submission packages; analyzes regulatory pathways for new medical devices; drafts responses to FDA deficiency letters and Notified Body queries; develops CE marking technical documentation under EU MDR 2017/745; coordinates multi-market approval strategies across FDA, EU, Health Canada, PMDA, and NMPA; and maintains regulatory intelligence on evolving standards. Use when users need to plan or execute FDA submissions, navigate 510(k) or PMA approval processes, achieve CE marking, prepare pre-submission meeting materials, write regulatory strategy documents, respond to agency queries, or manage compliance documentation for medical device market access.

72

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

The risk profile of this skill

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable regulatory skill with numbered workflows, validation checkpoints, and concrete templates/scripts. It is let down slightly by conciseness (reference-style padding inlined in SKILL.md) and a minor progressive-disclosure gap where one bundled script is unreferenced.

Suggestions

Move the KPI, Regulatory Monitoring Sources, and Common FDA Deficiencies tables into a reference file (e.g., references/regulatory-operations.md) and link to them from SKILL.md to reduce inlined padding.

Reference regulatory_pathway_analyzer.py in the Scripts table alongside regulatory_tracker.py so the bundled tool is discoverable.

Tighten the Regulatory Escalation Criteria and Documentation Efficiency Strategy tables to the essential rows, or relocate them to a reference file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and free of concept over-explanation, but several inline tables (Common FDA Deficiencies, Regulatory Monitoring Sources with frequencies, KPIs, Regulatory Escalation Criteria) are reference padding that competes with context and could be tightened or moved to a reference file.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-ready artifacts: 510(k)/PMA submission checklists, a Substantial Equivalence comparison table, a fill-in Regulatory Strategy template, GSPR checklist rows, and a real regulatory_tracker.py script with example invocation and output.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each multi-step workflow is numbered and closes with an explicit '**Validation**' checkpoint (e.g., '8. **Validation:** Submission accepted; MDUFA date received; tracking system updated'), and complex processes carry itemized checklists.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Body links to one-level-deep references that exist (fda/eu-mdr/global-regulatory-pathways/iso guides) and a scripts table, but a present bundle file (regulatory_pathway_analyzer.py) is never referenced from the body, and some content that could live in references is inlined.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that pairs concrete capabilities with an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause covering the natural phrasing users would say. It is comprehensive, well-scoped, and carries minimal conflict risk with other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists six concrete actions ('Prepares FDA 510(k), De Novo, and PMA submission packages', 'drafts responses to FDA deficiency letters', 'develops CE marking technical documentation under EU MDR 2017/745', 'coordinates multi-market approval strategies'), giving comprehensive coverage of the domain rather than vague abstractions.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (the enumerated actions) and 'when' via a concrete 'Use when users need to plan or execute FDA submissions, navigate 510(k) or PMA approval processes, achieve CE marking, prepare pre-submission meeting materials...' trigger clause.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users actually say — 'FDA submissions', '510(k)', 'PMA approval processes', 'CE marking', 'regulatory strategy documents', 'agency queries', 'compliance documentation', 'medical device market access' — with synonyms and variations well covered.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (medical-device regulatory affairs) with distinct triggers (510(k), PMA, CE marking, EU MDR, Notified Body) that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 4 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.