Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, domain-rich operating manual with excellent workflow sequencing and validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are a bundle whose referenced files and script are missing entirely, duplicated pathway-selection presentation, and reference-grade detail inlined into the main file.
Suggestions
Create the referenced bundle files (references/fda-submission-guide.md, references/eu-mdr-submission-guide.md, references/global-regulatory-pathways.md, references/iso-regulatory-requirements.md, and scripts/regulatory_tracker.py) or remove the links so navigation is not broken.
Consolidate the pathway-selection content: keep either the selection matrix or the ASCII decision trees, and move the redundancy into a reference file.
Move reference-grade tables (FDA submission timeline, common deficiencies, market priority and documentation-efficiency matrices) into the corresponding reference guides, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense domain data with no over-explanation of known concepts, but pathway selection is presented twice (the 'Regulatory Pathway Selection Matrix' table plus the ASCII 'Pathway Selection and Classification Reference' trees), and reference-grade tables (FDA submission timeline, deficiency prevention, market priority matrices) are inlined rather than kept in the reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance — fill-in templates, submission checklists, a worked Substantial Equivalence comparison table, specific standards (ISO 10993-1, IEC 62304, MDCG 2019-16), and the command 'python regulatory_tracker.py --report status' — but that script does not exist in the bundle, so the flagship command is not actually executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | All five workflows are clearly numbered, each ends with an explicit bolded **Validation:** checkpoint, submission package checklists are provided, and agency-response feedback loops ('Monitor MDUFA clock and respond to AI/RTA requests within deadlines', 'Address FDA questions and deficiencies') are explicit, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The structure is well organized (TOC, sectioned workflows, clearly signaled one-level 'See: references/...' links), but none of the four referenced files (fda-submission-guide.md, eu-mdr-submission-guide.md, global-regulatory-pathways.md, iso-regulatory-requirements.md) nor scripts/regulatory_tracker.py exist in the bundle — every reference is dangling — and substantial content that should live in those files is inlined in SKILL.md. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |