Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly-lean orchestrator doc with a clear 5-step workflow, concrete commands, and copy-paste forcing-question templates. It earns solid 4s across all dimensions; it does not reach 5s because of mild internal redundancy, the inherently abstract routing action, gating-style (not fix-retry) validation, and the absence of a verifiable own-bundle to anchor progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'When to invoke' symptom table into the 'Signal table' (or vice versa) to remove the overlap and tighten conciseness toward 5.
Add an explicit error-recovery loop for the routing workflow (e.g., 'If a sub-skill digest is missing the canon citation, re-run with --cite') to lift workflow_clarity from gating-only to fix-retry validation.
Convert the 'References' canon list into a navigable references file within this skill's bundle so the one-level-deep pointers are verifiable, raising progressive_disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of what a clinical trial or TAM is), but it has redundancy — the 'When to invoke' symptom table overlaps the 'Signal table', and the 'Distinct from' content repeats the description's boundaries — so it is efficient with minor trim opportunities rather than perfectly lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives executable commands ('python3 skills/<sub-skill>/scripts/onboard.py --show'), copy-paste forcing-question templates, and keyword signal tables, but the core routing action ('Forward original prompt + structured inputs') is abstract by nature of an orchestrator, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow (Explore → forcing question → decision-tree walk → invoke → digest) with explicit gating checkpoints ('Never silently chain', 'Confirm before chaining', 'route silently'), but the validation is decision-gating rather than fix-retry feedback loops, so it stops just short of the explicit-validation anchor of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview that points one level deep to sub-skill paths (onboard.py, ar_evaluator.py) and a build-pattern doc, with clear section headers; however no bundle files ship with this orchestrator and the 'References' canon list are non-file citations, so it is good but not the textbook one-level-deep split of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |