Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete commands, verbatim prompts, and an exact output template, organized into a clear 3-step workflow with validation checkpoints and well-signaled one-level-deep references. It is tight throughout, with only minor motivational prose that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Trim the motivational framing ('Claude's default is to agree with you', the portability blockquote) to tighten conciseness without losing the load-bearing guidance.
Add a one-line error-recovery note for the script invocations (e.g., what to do if brief_builder reports a missing critical input) to push workflow clarity to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and purposeful with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but includes lightly trimmable motivational framing ('Claude's default is to agree with you') and the portability note that aren't strictly load-bearing. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: copy-paste bash invocations for all three scripts with realistic arguments, verbatim panelist prompts, and an exact verdict output template covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence (Frame → Panel → Verdict) with an explicit pre-panel checkpoint (brief_builder flags missing inputs) and a 'do not average, run the synthesizer' gate; only a minor gap in error-recovery guidance for failed script runs. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview that links one-level-deep to real, verified references (3 canon files) and assets (worksheet + example verdict), each clearly signaled with its purpose and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |