Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable skill body with a clear five-step workflow, executable script invocations, and a fixed output template backed by real reference and script bundles. Its main weakness is mild redundancy between the 'Reference Files' and 'Tools' sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'Reference Files' list into the 'Tools' section (or vice versa) to remove the duplicated file listings and tighten the body.
Expand the two worked Examples into short input->output transcripts so the expected behavior is fully copy-paste verifiable rather than described as outcomes.
Add one explicit verification checkpoint in Step 2 (e.g., flag and re-ask when required inputs are contradictory) to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the 'Reference Files' list duplicates the 'Tools' section, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable CLI commands with real flags and JSON output plus a fixed output template and worked examples; the examples are described as outcomes rather than full transcripts, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with checkpoints (handle partial data, confirm segment/stage, ask if unclear) and caps on priority issues; no explicit error/feedback loop, but the advisory analysis is non-destructive so that is acceptable. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points one level deep to real, well-signaled bundle files (formulas.md, benchmarks.md, input-template.md, three scripts); minor organization overlap between 'Reference Files' and 'Tools' keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |