CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

setup

Set up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator. Use when the user runs /ar:setup or asks to start optimizing a file with the autoresearch loop.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is setup in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

/ar:setup — Create New Experiment

Set up a new autoresearch experiment with all required configuration.

Usage

/ar:setup                                    # Interactive mode
/ar:setup engineering api-speed src/api.py "pytest bench.py" p50_ms lower
/ar:setup --list                             # Show existing experiments
/ar:setup --list-evaluators                  # Show available evaluators

What It Does

If arguments provided

Pass them directly to the setup script:

python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py \
  --domain {domain} --name {name} \
  --target {target} --eval "{eval_cmd}" \
  --metric {metric} --direction {direction} \
  [--evaluator {evaluator}] [--scope {scope}]

If no arguments (interactive mode)

Collect each parameter one at a time:

  1. Domain — Ask: "What domain? (engineering, marketing, content, prompts, custom)"
  2. Name — Ask: "Experiment name? (e.g., api-speed, blog-titles)"
  3. Target file — Ask: "Which file to optimize?" Verify it exists.
  4. Eval command — Ask: "How to measure it? (e.g., pytest bench.py, python evaluate.py)"
  5. Metric — Ask: "What metric does the eval output? (e.g., p50_ms, ctr_score)"
  6. Direction — Ask: "Is lower or higher better?"
  7. Evaluator (optional) — Show built-in evaluators. Ask: "Use a built-in evaluator, or your own?"
  8. Scope — Ask: "Store in project (.autoresearch/) or user (~/.autoresearch/)?"

Then run setup_experiment.py with the collected parameters.

Listing

# Show existing experiments
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py --list

# Show available evaluators
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py --list-evaluators

Built-in Evaluators

NameMetricUse Case
benchmark_speedp50_ms (lower)Function/API execution time
benchmark_sizesize_bytes (lower)File, bundle, Docker image size
test_pass_ratepass_rate (higher)Test suite pass percentage
build_speedbuild_seconds (lower)Build/compile/Docker build time
memory_usagepeak_mb (lower)Peak memory during execution
llm_judge_contentctr_score (higher)Headlines, titles, descriptions
llm_judge_promptquality_score (higher)System prompts, agent instructions
llm_judge_copyengagement_score (higher)Social posts, ad copy, emails

After Setup

Report to the user:

  • Experiment path and branch name
  • Whether the eval command worked and the baseline metric
  • Suggest: "Run /ar:run {domain}/{name} to start iterating, or /ar:loop {domain}/{name} for autonomous mode."
Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Last updated
First committed

Canonical home

alirezarezvani/claude-skills
In sync

since Aug 28, 2026

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.