Name: site-architecture
Rating: 68 (1 reviews)
Author: alirezarezvani

site-architecture

When the user wants to audit, redesign, or plan their website's structure, URL hierarchy, navigation design, or internal linking strategy. Use when the user mentions 'site architecture,' 'URL structure,' 'internal links,' 'site navigation,' 'breadcrumbs,' 'topic clusters,' 'hub pages,' 'orphan pages,' 'silo structure,' 'information architecture,' or 'website reorganization.' Also use when someone has SEO problems and the root cause is structural (not content or schema). NOT for content strategy decisions about what to write (use content-strategy) or for schema markup (use schema-markup).

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is site-architecture in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, actionable strategy skill with concrete examples and clear multi-mode workflows. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: two referenced files and one referenced script are promised in the body but absent from the bundle.

Suggestions

Add the missing `references/url-design-guide.md` and `references/internal-linking-playbook.md` (and `scripts/sitemap_analyzer.py`), or remove the pointers to them so navigation is not broken.

Move the larger lookup tables (Common Architecture Mistakes, Anchor Text Rules) into the reference files and keep only a short summary inline, tightening the SKILL.md overview.

Add a light verification step to Mode 1 (e.g., cross-check the orphan candidates against GSC/Screaming Frog before delivering) so the audit workflow has an explicit checkpoint.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient dense tables and rules with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows, but a few editorial sentences ('Navigation serves two masters... Most sites optimize for neither'; 'Internal links are the most underused SEO lever') could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Highly concrete for an instruction skill — specific URL examples, Do/Don't tables, an anchor-text type table, and an ASCII hub-and-spoke diagram — but references a non-existent `scripts/sitemap_analyzer.py`, which is a real execution gap.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Three numbered modes (Audit / Plan / Internal Linking) plus a 'Before Starting' context-gathering section give a clear sequence; this is advisory rather than destructive so the missing validation checkpoints are a minor gap rather than a cap.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Section structure is clear and references are well-signaled and one level deep ('See references/url-design-guide.md for patterns by site type'), but the referenced files do not exist in the bundle and substantial reference-grade content (mistakes table, anchor-text table) is inlined rather than split out.	3 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-structured description that clearly states capabilities, gives exhaustive natural trigger terms, and draws explicit boundaries against sibling skills. The only minor gap is that the action verbs (audit/redesign/plan) are high-level rather than granular operations.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names several concrete actions ('audit, redesign, or plan') across four specific domains ('website's structure, URL hierarchy, navigation design, or internal linking strategy'), but the verbs stay somewhat high-level rather than enumerating granular operations.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' (audit/redesign/plan structure, URL hierarchy, navigation, internal linking) and 'when' ('Use when the user mentions...'; 'Also use when someone has SEO problems and the root cause is structural'), with concrete trigger phrases and a third-person voice.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Comprehensive list of natural trigger phrases users would actually say — 'site architecture,' 'URL structure,' 'internal links,' 'breadcrumbs,' 'topic clusters,' 'hub pages,' 'orphan pages,' 'silo structure,' 'information architecture,' 'website reorganization' — including synonyms and variants.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear niche with explicit negative boundaries ('NOT for content strategy decisions... use content-strategy' / 'NOT for schema markup... use schema-markup'), minimizing overlap with adjacent SEO skills.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 4 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: .gemini/skills/site-architecture/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~3 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.