Name: strategic-alignment
Rating: 65.60000000000001 (1 reviews)
Author: alirezarezvani

strategic-alignment

Cascades strategy from boardroom to individual contributor. Detects and fixes misalignment between company goals and team execution. Covers strategy articulation, cascade mapping, orphan goal detection, silo identification, communication gap analysis, and realignment protocols. Use when teams are pulling in different directions, OKRs don't connect, departments optimize locally at company expense, or when user mentions alignment, strategy cascade, silo, conflicting OKRs, or strategy communication.

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.gemini/skills/strategic-alignment/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is strategic-alignment in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Quality

Content

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-organized, clearly sequenced diagnostic framework with strong workflow clarity, but it over-relies on prose over executable artifacts and signals two bundle references (script and playbook) that are absent, breaking progressive disclosure. Adding the missing bundle files and tightening redundant explanation would lift the weakest dimensions.

Suggestions

Create the referenced `scripts/alignment_checker.py` and `references/alignment-playbook.md` so the in-body links resolve, or remove the references if those materials are not intended to ship.

Add an explicit validate/feedback loop to the alignment-check workflow (e.g., run the checker, review flagged orphans/conflicts, re-run until clean) to justify workflow_clarity at 5 for a diagnostic batch operation.

Tighten prose-heavy sections (silo root causes, message decay model) that restate organizational dynamics Claude already knows, trimming toward diagnostic signal over explanation.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Generally lean and assumes competence, but several prose sections (silo root causes, message decay model) restate organizational dynamics Claude already knows and could be tightened.	4 / 5
Actionability	Mostly instructional prose with diagnostic questions and scoring rubrics rather than executable artifacts; the one command (`python scripts/alignment_checker.py`) points to a script that does not exist in the bundle, so concrete executable guidance is incomplete.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Six-step core framework is clearly sequenced with diagnostic scoring checkpoints and fixes per failure pattern; falls short of 5 because batch/diagnostic operations lack an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body references `scripts/alignment_checker.py` and `references/alignment-playbook.md` but neither file exists in the bundle, so the signaled deep references are broken and navigation is not actually possible.	2 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is comprehensive, specific, and well-structured: it names concrete actions, covers natural trigger terms, explicitly states 'Use when' scenarios, and carves out a distinct niche. One minor blemish is slight verbosity near the end, but it does not undermine clarity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names many concrete actions in third person ('Cascades strategy', 'Detects and fixes misalignment') and explicitly enumerates coverage areas (orphan goal detection, silo identification, communication gap analysis, realignment protocols).	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' (the enumerated actions) and 'when' with a concrete 'Use when' clause listing multiple scenarios.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Comprehensive coverage of natural trigger terms users would say ('alignment', 'strategy cascade', 'silo', 'conflicting OKRs', 'OKRs don't connect', 'departments optimize locally').	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear niche (strategy cascade / alignment) with distinct triggers ('strategy cascade', 'orphan OKRs', 'silo'); minimal conflict risk with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 5 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: .gemini/skills/strategic-alignment/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~14 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.