Run a red-green-refactor TDD workflow — generate failing tests first, implement to green, then check coverage gaps. Usage: /tdd <generate|coverage|validate> [target]
63
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.gemini/skills/tdd/SKILL.mdDrive a test-first workflow for $ARGUMENTS using the TDD Guide skill. The first word of $ARGUMENTS selects the mode (generate, coverage, or validate); the rest is the target file or directory. If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask which mode and target.
Note on tooling: the tdd-guide scripts are Python library modules, not CLI tools — import them; do not invoke them as commands. Runnable patterns below.
/tdd generate <file-or-dir> — write failing tests FIRSTengineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/SKILL.md and engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/references/tdd-best-practices.md for the red-green-refactor discipline and test-case taxonomy (happy path, edge cases, error cases)engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/references/framework-guide.md for Jest/Vitest/pytest/JUnit conventionscd engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/scripts && python3 -c "
from test_generator import TestGenerator, TestFramework
g = TestGenerator(framework=TestFramework.PYTEST, language='python')
cases = g.generate_from_requirements({'acceptance_criteria': [
{'id': 'AC1', 'description': 'validates email format'},
{'id': 'AC2', 'description': 'rejects duplicate emails'}]})
print(g.generate_test_file('registration', cases))
"/tdd coverage <coverage-report> — analyze gaps against a thresholdpytest --cov --cov-report=lcov, vitest run --coverage, jest --coverage)cd engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/scripts && python3 -c "
from coverage_analyzer import CoverageAnalyzer
a = CoverageAnalyzer()
a.parse_coverage_report(open('<path-to-lcov-or-json>').read(), 'lcov') # or 'json' / 'xml'
print(a.calculate_summary())
for gap in a.identify_gaps(threshold=80.0): print(gap)
"(Smoke-test input available at engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/assets/sample_coverage_report.lcov.)
/tdd generate — coverage gaps are filled with tests, not excuses/tdd validate <test-file> — review test qualityRead the test file and check it against engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/references/tdd-best-practices.md:
Report failures with concrete rewrite suggestions.
For wiring coverage thresholds into CI, follow engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/references/ci-integration.md.
engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/SKILL.md (+ HOW_TO_USE.md)engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/references/tdd-best-practices.mdengineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/references/framework-guide.mdengineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/references/ci-integration.mdengineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/scripts/ (test_generator, coverage_analyzer, tdd_workflow, fixture_generator, metrics_calculator — import-only)engineering-team/skills/tdd-guide/assets/19392f7
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.