Technology stack evaluation and comparison with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, evaluating technology stacks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.
80
57%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
95%
1.26xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./engineering-team/tech-stack-evaluator/SKILL.mdFramework comparison workflow
Uses comparator script
0%
100%
Custom weights applied
100%
100%
Weights sum to 100%
100%
100%
Comparison matrix present
100%
100%
Weighted total scores
100%
100%
Confidence level reported
37%
100%
Confidence from score gap
0%
100%
Top decision factors
100%
100%
Trade-offs documented
100%
100%
Risks and mitigations
100%
100%
Pros/cons per framework
100%
100%
TCO cost projection
Uses TCO script
0%
100%
Initial costs breakdown
100%
100%
Training cost calculation
100%
100%
Year-by-year operational costs
100%
100%
Compound growth on hosting
100%
100%
Hidden costs included
100%
100%
Scaling analysis present
100%
100%
5-year total TCO
100%
100%
Top cost drivers
100%
100%
Optimization opportunities
100%
100%
Vendor lock-in risk cost
100%
100%
Migration effort and risk assessment
Uses migration script
0%
75%
Complexity score 1-10
100%
100%
Four-factor complexity breakdown
100%
100%
Effort estimate with buffer
40%
30%
Four migration phases
0%
40%
Phase hours and duration
100%
100%
Technical risks covered
100%
100%
Business risks covered
100%
100%
Team learning curve addressed
100%
100%
Rollback plan present
100%
100%
Assumptions documented
100%
100%
Ecosystem health scoring
Uses ecosystem script
0%
83%
Overall health score present
100%
100%
Five health components reported
100%
100%
GitHub star threshold scoring
100%
100%
Corporate backing scores applied
100%
100%
npm dependency scoring
0%
87%
Maintenance health assessed
100%
100%
Viability level stated
0%
100%
Risk level stated
100%
100%
Strengths identified
100%
100%
Risks identified
100%
100%
Final recommendation provided
100%
100%
Security and compliance assessment
Uses security script
0%
100%
Overall security score present
100%
100%
Security grade applied
100%
100%
HIPAA readiness level
0%
100%
SOC2 readiness level
0%
100%
HIPAA missing features identified
100%
100%
SOC2 missing features identified
100%
100%
Vulnerability scoring reflected
100%
100%
Patch responsiveness scored
100%
100%
Security recommendations present
100%
100%
Final recommendation given
100%
100%
Overall risk level stated
0%
100%
Cloud provider selection with vendor lock-in
Uses TCO script for cloud
0%
83%
3-year cost projection per provider
100%
100%
Compound growth applied
100%
100%
Vendor lock-in assessment present
100%
100%
Proprietary services listed
100%
100%
Switching cost estimated
100%
100%
Lock-in risk score calculated
100%
100%
User-specified weights used
100%
100%
Weights sum to 100%
100%
100%
Portable alternatives noted
100%
100%
Final recommendation with rationale
100%
100%
Assumptions documented
40%
50%
a96cc20
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.