CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ux-researcher-designer

UX research and design toolkit for Senior UX Designer/Researcher including data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis. Use when conducting user research, creating personas, mapping user journeys, planning usability tests, or validating designs.

64

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

The risk profile of this skill

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./product-team/skills/ux-researcher-designer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable overview with real bundle files and clear navigation. Its main weakness is length: substantial generator output and reference-grade tables are inlined in SKILL.md instead of being deferred to the references that already exist.

Suggestions

Move the full persona_generator sample output and the Archetypes/Output Components tables into a references file (e.g. expand references/persona-methodology.md) and link to it from the Tool Reference section to reduce SKILL.md length.

Trim the 13-item Trigger Terms list to the distinct phrases already covered by the frontmatter description to avoid redundancy.

Add an explicit validate-then-retry checkpoint to Workflow 2 (journey mapping) and Workflow 4 (synthesis) to match the validation rigor already present in Workflow 1 and the checklist section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~415-line body is information-dense and avoids explaining basic concepts, but the full persona_generator sample output, archetype, and output-components tables are inlined detail that could be trimmed or moved to references, leaving it mostly efficient but tightenable.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides executable commands ("python scripts/persona_generator.py"), a concrete JSON input schema, task/metric tables, and templates, but journey-map and synthesis steps rely on fill-in templates rather than fully executable code, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Four numbered workflows are clearly sequenced with a persona-validation step and a dedicated Validation Checklist section; the operations are non-destructive so the cap does not apply, though not every workflow has an explicit validate-fix-retry loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A Table of Contents plus well-signaled one-level-deep references (all four referenced files and the script exist) give good navigation, but detailed tool-reference and quick-reference content remains inlined rather than split out, so it is below the cleanly-split 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly states both capability and trigger context with concrete, natural-language phrases. It is held back only by slightly abstract action framing and minor overlap with generic design-validation skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ("data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis") but a couple are framed as capabilities rather than crisp actions and empathy-mapping/sample-size work from the body is absent, so it sits below the comprehensive 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (the toolkit's four capabilities) and when ("Use when conducting user research, creating personas...") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases users would say ("conducting user research, creating personas, mapping user journeys, planning usability tests, or validating designs") give good coverage, but synonyms present in the body (empathy map, pain points, interview findings) are missing, keeping it below 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "Senior UX Designer/Researcher" framing carves a clear niche, but "validating designs" overlaps slightly with adjacent UI/design skills, so minor overlap risk keeps it at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.