Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is dense, expert-level, and immediately actionable, with a crisp archetype-selection workflow and a strong verification checklist. Its main weaknesses are organizational: five referenced example files are missing from the bundle, and a sizable block of non-layout interactive-component API detail is inlined in the main file instead of a reference.
Suggestions
Ship the five examples/*.tsx files referenced in the Examples section (they are also cited from references/archetypes.md) — or remove the section and fold runnable skeletons into references/archetypes.md so no referenced path dangles.
Move the interactive-extras detail (Collapse/Collapses accordion, Tabs, Dropdown, Popover, Steps, Reveal state APIs) into a reference file, keeping a one-line pointer plus the top trap warnings in SKILL.md; it is non-layout API detail inflating the main file.
Add an explicit post-build verification step to the checklist (e.g., confirm mobile stacking, burger toggle behavior, and fixed-navbar body offset) to close the workflow's validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every line carries non-obvious, library-specific gotchas ("There is no Tile component", the controlled Navbar.Burger wiring, the --bulma-shadow override mechanics) with no known-concept padding, but the ~20-line run-on "Interactive extras" bullet with its deeply nested parentheticals could be trimmed or split, keeping it below the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly executable — exact prop names and values ("bgColor=\"scheme-main-bis\"", "Column display=\"flex\" flexDirection=\"column\""), a complete inline-style→helper mapping table, and copy-paste CSS — but the five promised example files (examples/app-shell.tsx etc.) are absent from the bundle, a minor gap against fully copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear and unambiguous: map request signals to an archetype via the table, build in one shot, then verify against the end checklist — which functions as an explicit checkpoint. There is no dedicated post-build validation step (e.g., confirming responsive stacking or burger toggling), so it sits at the clear-sequence-with-minor-gaps anchor rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The two references (layout-components.md, archetypes.md) exist, are one level deep, and are clearly signaled with descriptions, but 5 of the 7 referenced paths — the entire examples/ directory listed in the Examples section and cited from archetypes.md — do not exist in the bundle, and ~25 lines of interactive-component state API detail (Collapse/Collapses, Tabs, Popover, Steps) are inlined in SKILL.md where a reference file belongs. This is more than minor organization gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |