Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Lean, highly actionable, and well-structured, but the workflow lacks an explicit validation/verification checkpoint before handing off the design artifact, which is the main weakness.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step before the Step-3 handoff, e.g. 'Validate 03-arch-fe.md against story acceptance criteria and the 03-arch-template checklist; only hand off when all sections are covered.'
De-duplicate directives that appear in both Step 2 and Anti-patterns (e.g. NEVER useEffect, server/client boundary) — keep the rule in one place and cross-reference it to trim tokens.
Replace a few template placeholders with one concrete worked example (a real feature module name) so the FSD-Lite scaffold and hooks are copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is terse and directive (tables, code blocks, anti-pattern list) with no concept padding, but minor redundancy such as "NEVER useEffect" appearing in both Step 2 and Anti-patterns could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete `grep`/`find` commands, a route table, a file-tree scaffold, and executable `useMutation`/Zod snippets, though template placeholders like `{m}` and `{X}` leave minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three sequenced steps with a Step-1 reuse gate ("Si pattern existe... reutilizar") and a HARD-GATE skill-load check are present, but there is no explicit verification that the output artifact is complete before the Step-3 handoff. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file sections (Skills cargados, Workflow, Anti-patterns, Output format) with a clearly signaled external template path; no bundle files exist to navigate, so structure alone carries it just shy of ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |