Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable workflow with explicit validation, feedback loops, and escalation paths. Its main weaknesses are minor redundancy in the self-fix policy and the absence of any progressive-disclosure split into reference files.
Suggestions
Consolidate the self-fix policy so it lives in one place (either the Step 3 Case C block or the detailed table) instead of being described twice.
Extract the per-surface sub-auditor category lists (BE 11 / FE 12 / AGENTIC 14 categories) into reference files the sub-auditors load, reducing SKILL.md length and enabling progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and terse with tables and code blocks, assuming Claude knows DDD/FSD/LangGraph without explaining them; the self-fix policy is stated both inline in Step 3 Case C and again in the detailed table, a minor redundancy that could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable bash (git log/diff, ruff format/check, git commit/push), concrete Agent() spawn templates with prompt bodies, and exact YAML state-transition snippets covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Steps 1-5 with explicit validation ('Re-correr quality gates; Si verde → APPROVED; Si falla → CHANGES_REQUESTED'), feedback loops (audit→fix→re-audit with cap 2 then escalate), and anti-pattern/self-fix checklists for the destructive git-push operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no monolithic wall of text and no problematic inlining of reference material, though it is a single file with no bundle references to split content one level deeper. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |