Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable orchestration protocol with clear sequencing and an explicit audit gate on merges, but progressive disclosure is broken: all 10 bundled reference files are orphaned — never linked from the body — so Claude would never load the PM methodology (RICE/WSJF, JTBD, story mapping) at the moments the body's commands call for it. Secondary weaknesses are mild duplication between sections and missing failure-path guidance.
Suggestions
Link the existing references/ files at their point of use in the commands table and sections: "priorizar" → references/06-rice-wsjf.md and 03-now-next-later.md, "rompé esto en historias" / "historia de usuario" → references/02-user-story-mapping.md, "discovery" → references/01-opportunity-solution-tree.md and 09-research-protocol.md, "PI nuevo" scoping → references/04-prd-template.md, "idea {x}" → references/05-jtbd.md and 07-working-backwards.md.
Consolidate duplication: fold the "Romper historias grandes" section into the single decomposition workflow (the table row and the section describe the same action twice), and let Anti-patterns reference the Rol exclusions instead of restating them.
Add failure-path guidance for the merge gate and story workflow: what to do when REVIEW-final.md is not APPROVED (e.g., route back to /dev-team with the audit findings) so the validation step has a feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Telegraphic, project-specific protocol with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every section is operational (bootstrap commands, ownership lists, routing flow). Not a 5 because of real duplication: "Romper historias grandes" repeats the "rompé esto en historias" table row, and the Anti-patterns restate the Rol section's NO-toca list (e.g., 01-spec.md is /po appears in both). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: exact bootstrap commands (`git status --short && git branch --show-current...`), a Chris-dice→acción table mapping utterances to specific file paths, concrete merge steps with exact YAML fields (`status: planned` → `live`, `pr_introduced`, `pi_introduced`). Not a 5 because some steps stay high-level — "Identifica scope total", "Define dependencies entre stories", "Escalate Chris para validar scope" give direction without the specifics to execute them. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The end-to-end routing flow is clearly sequenced, the merge workflow has an explicit validation gate ("Verificar 06-audit/REVIEW-final.md APPROVED → escribir 07-merge.md"), the bootstrap defines an exact reading order, and anti-patterns forbid skipping phases. Not a 5 because there is no failure-path feedback loop (what to do when REVIEW-final.md is not APPROVED, or when validation of a story fails) and multi-instance conflict handling defers entirely to an external doc. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle ships 10 reference files (references/01-opportunity-solution-tree.md through 09-research-protocol.md, plus pm-nico-ssot.md) covering exactly the workflows the body invokes — prioritization (06-rice-wsjf.md), story decomposition (02-user-story-mapping.md), discovery (01-opportunity-solution-tree.md), roadmap (03-now-next-later.md) — yet the body never references any of them; its pointers all go to repo docs (docs/specs/templates/PI-template.md, docs/process/parallel-sessions-protocol.md). The references are effectively invisible, matching the anchor where references are buried/undiscoverable rather than merely imperfectly signaled. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |