Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly actionable workflow document: five gated phases with explicit validation checkpoints, concrete thresholds, and a genuinely instructive worked example. The main defects are progressive-disclosure leaks — an uncited, conflicting saturation-signals reference and inline hook/arc lists that duplicate reference files — which also cost some token efficiency.
Suggestions
Replace the inline '6 saturation signals' at line 140 with a pointer to references/saturation-signals.md, and reconcile the two lists — the body's signals (competitor usage, hook similarity, engagement drop >40%) conflict with the reference file's signals (engagement decay, copy explosion, CTR decline, negative sentiment, algorithm deprioritization, parody emergence).
Collapse the inline '7 hook types' and '8 content arcs' enumerations to a count plus a pointer to references/virality-frameworks.md sections 2-3, keeping the body as an overview rather than duplicating reference detail.
In Phase 2 Layer 2, add the missing citation to references/saturation-signals.md so the orphaned bundle file is reachable from the SKILL.md navigation path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with domain-specific operational rules Claude does not intrinsically know (gates, thresholds, STEPPS/SCAMPER mappings) and avoids explaining general concepts, but it inlines compressed duplicates of reference material: the '6 saturation signals' at line 140, the '7 hook types', and the '8 content arcs' all restate content that lives expanded in references/saturation-signals.md and references/virality-frameworks.md. This fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the score-5 every-token-earns-its-place anchor, but it is well above the noticeably-verbose score-3 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: exact tool assignments per phase ('Tools: WebSearch, WebFetch'), specific file paths to read, numeric thresholds ('Only advance references scoring >= 10/18', 'Minimum 5 references from at least 2 different niches AND 2 different countries', 'Apply 2-3 SCAMPER operations per reference (minimum 2)'), an explicit Phase 1 gate ('industry, voice_tone, 2+ pain_points, 1+ platform, 1+ objective'), and a worked end-to-end example with exact Spanish hook text. This matches the 'fully executable... specific examples cover the common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five phases are explicitly sequenced with mode-detection routing entry points, HARD GATE checkpoints between phases, and validation with feedback loops at every stage: STEPPS threshold filtering, a user-confirmation gate, the 5-check validation with 'If any check fails, apply corrective SCAMPER operation or discard', and a final 10-point checklist. This matches the score-5 anchor (clear sequence, explicit validation, error-recovery loops); no destructive/batch cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: each phase signals its reference file ('Reference: references/adaptation-engine.md'), all cited files exist and are one level deep. However, references/saturation-signals.md is never cited from the body — its content is instead inlined (with a conflicting signal list) at line 140 — and the hook-type/arc enumerations duplicate references/virality-frameworks.md sections 2-3. These orphaned/duplicated placements fit 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps' rather than the score-5 clean-overview anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |