Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow skill with strong validation gates and executable templates. Its weaknesses are redundancy — the v4.1 gate content appears three times and version-history dates litter the text — and a monolithic 415-line body that inlines spec-template material instead of splitting it into reference files.
Suggestions
Consolidate the v4.1 sub-category coverage rule into one canonical table (Step 3) and have the Step 5 checklist and Anti-patterns section reference it instead of restating it, cutting ~40 lines of duplication.
Move version-history markers ('v4.1 cement 2026-05-19', 'R26 2026-05-05', 'Wave 3 redesign', 'post reorg 2026-05-15') into a single 'Changelog / deprecated patterns' section or drop them, per the time-sensitive-information guideline.
Extract the spec-section templates (microcopy table, estados visuales, grader YAML shapes) into a references/spec-template.md and point to them from Step 3, so SKILL.md stays an operational overview; the Referencias section already shows this pattern works.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient operational guidance, but the v4.1 sub-category table is repeated three times (Step 3 table, Step 5 checklist, Anti-patterns) and version-history markers like '★ v4.1 cement 2026-05-19', 'R26 2026-05-05', and 'post reorg 2026-05-15' are embedded in prose rather than a changelog/deprecated section, per the time-sensitive-information guideline. This fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the noticeably padded anchor 2, since almost all content is operational rather than explanations of known concepts. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready: executable bootstrap commands ('WS=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)', 'python3 -m http.server 8888'), concrete YAML templates for frontmatter/graders/telemetry/checkpoint, exact file paths, per-screen state tables, and literal output-format blocks including sample microcopy ('Aún no tienes ofertas'). Placeholders like {story-id} and {m} are appropriate template variables, not gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint: a hard pre-handoff gate checklist ('Si gate FAIL → STOP, NO transition refining→refined'), an iterate-with-Chris feedback loop until 'ratified_by_chris: true', anti-pattern for giving up after one iteration, and graded escalation rules (pequeño/medio/grande). This matches the anchor-5 example of sequence plus explicit validation with error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and the 415-line body inlines material that belongs in reference files — full spec-section templates (microcopy table, estados visuales, grader YAML) that duplicate docs/specs/templates/01-spec-template.md. The trailing 'Referencias' list is clearly signaled and one level deep, but the body itself is a near-monolithic wall, fitting 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' rather than the well-split anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |