Content
55%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is maximally concise and cleanly organized as a command menu, but it provides almost no actionable process, workflow sequencing, or validation guidance. It reads as a reference card rather than skill instructions.
Suggestions
Add a brief workflow showing how to chain the commands (e.g. search markets -> inspect a market -> evaluate +EV opportunities) with the expected decision points.
Include concrete executable detail for at least the primary commands — what they return and how to interpret or act on the output.
Add validation/verification guidance for any trading or market-interaction steps, since these involve consequential actions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is extremely lean — a one-line intro and a four-line command menu — with no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows, matching 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It lists command syntax with one-line descriptions but gives no executable steps, API details, or guidance on handling output, fitting 'Minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute'; not 3 because no executable process is provided. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no multi-step workflow, sequencing, or validation for a skill exposing several commands, fitting 'Rough sequence present but many gaps'; not 1 because the command menu is coherent rather than incoherent, but no real process is defined. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line skill with no external references, the single heading plus organized Commands section is well-structured per the simple-skill exception, fitting 'Good structure; most content appropriately placed'; not 5 because the content is too sparse to demonstrate clear navigation value. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |