Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and concise, with copy-paste command tables covering the full command surface. Its main weakness is the absence of validation or confirmation steps for destructive trading operations like closeall and high-leverage position opens.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/confirmation steps before destructive and batch operations, e.g. confirm position size and leverage before opening, and require explicit acknowledgement before '/bf closeall'.
Remove or consolidate the Examples section since it duplicates the command tables, or repurpose it to show full multi-step workflows with checks.
Include a brief error-handling note for common failures (insufficient margin, API errors, rejected orders).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence, using command tables and brief examples rather than explaining concepts; the only trimmable redundancy is the Examples section repeating commands already in the tables, so it sits above the score-3 midpoint but not at a perfect 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready (e.g. '/bf long BTCUSDT 0.01 10x'), and the Examples section covers the common cases, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Quick Start gives a rough sequence but the skill performs destructive/batch operations (closeall, high-leverage positions) with no validation, confirmation, or error-feedback steps, so workflow clarity is capped at 3 per the destructive-operations guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into clearly labeled sections (Quick Start, Commands by category, Examples) with no need for external references; minor organization gaps (overlapping examples) keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |