bridge

Cross-chain token transfers using Wormhole and CCTP

Quality

59%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./src/skills/bundled/bridge/SKILL.md

Quality

Discovery

40%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a specific technical domain (cross-chain transfers via Wormhole/CCTP) which provides good distinctiveness, but lacks concrete action verbs and completely omits trigger guidance. It reads more like a topic label than a functional skill description that would help Claude choose it appropriately.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'bridge tokens', 'transfer between chains', 'Wormhole bridge', 'Circle CCTP', or specific chain names (Ethereum, Solana, etc.)

List specific concrete actions such as 'initiate bridge transfers', 'verify cross-chain messages', 'estimate bridging fees', 'track transfer status'

Include common user phrasings like 'move tokens to another chain', 'bridging', 'cross-chain swap' to improve trigger term coverage

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (cross-chain token transfers) and specific technologies (Wormhole, CCTP), but doesn't list concrete actions like 'bridge tokens', 'verify transfers', or 'estimate fees'.	2 / 3
Completeness	Only addresses 'what' at a high level; completely missing a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant technical terms 'Wormhole', 'CCTP', 'cross-chain', and 'token transfers', but misses common user variations like 'bridge', 'bridging', 'move tokens between chains', or specific chain names.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The specific mention of Wormhole and CCTP protocols creates a clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills; these are distinct blockchain bridging technologies.	3 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Implementation

79%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured API reference with excellent actionability through complete code examples and clear command syntax. The main weaknesses are the lack of explicit validation checkpoints for financial operations (critical for cross-chain transfers) and the monolithic structure that could benefit from progressive disclosure to separate files.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation steps in the TypeScript examples, such as checking balances before transfer and verifying transaction success before proceeding to redemption

Include error handling examples showing what to do when transfers fail or get stuck in 'attesting' state

Split into separate files: SKILL.md (overview + quick start), API.md (full TypeScript reference), COMMANDS.md (chat commands), with clear navigation links

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is lean and efficient, presenting information in tables and code blocks without explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding or unnecessary context.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides fully executable TypeScript code examples with complete import statements, function calls, and realistic parameters. Chat commands are copy-paste ready with clear syntax patterns.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The Transfer Flow section outlines steps but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. For cross-chain transfers involving real funds, there should be explicit verification steps (e.g., 'Verify balance before proceeding', 'Confirm VAA is valid before redeeming') and error recovery guidance.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Content is well-organized with clear sections, but this is a monolithic file (~180 lines) that could benefit from splitting API reference, examples, and best practices into separate files. No references to external documentation for advanced topics.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: alsk1992/CloddsBot
Commit: 2a8c94e

Reviewed: 29 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.