CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bridge

Cross-chain token transfers using Wormhole and CCTP

61

Quality

52%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./src/skills/bundled/bridge/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

40%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear and distinctive niche (cross-chain token transfers via Wormhole and CCTP) but is too terse to be effective for skill selection. It lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') and does not enumerate specific actions or common user-facing synonyms like 'bridge', 'bridging tokens', or 'USDC'.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about bridging tokens across chains, transferring USDC cross-chain, or mentions Wormhole or CCTP.'

List specific concrete actions such as 'Initiate cross-chain transfers, redeem tokens on destination chains, check transfer attestation status, configure Wormhole relayers.'

Include common natural-language synonyms and variations like 'bridge tokens', 'bridging', 'USDC', 'Circle cross-chain', 'multi-chain transfer' to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (cross-chain token transfers) and specific technologies (Wormhole, CCTP), but does not list multiple concrete actions like 'initiate transfer', 'redeem tokens', 'check attestation status', etc.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does (cross-chain token transfers using Wormhole and CCTP) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance, which per the rubric should cap completeness at 2, and since the 'what' is also thin, this scores a 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like 'cross-chain', 'token transfers', 'Wormhole', and 'CCTP' that users familiar with the domain would use, but misses common variations like 'bridge tokens', 'bridging', 'Circle', 'USDC transfer', or 'cross-chain messaging'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'Wormhole' and 'CCTP' for cross-chain token transfers is a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills; these are distinct protocol names that clearly delineate the skill's scope.

3 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Implementation

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides strong actionable guidance with concrete, executable TypeScript examples and clear chat commands for cross-chain bridging. Its main weaknesses are the lack of error handling/validation checkpoints for what are inherently risky financial operations, and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting into overview + reference files. The verbose console.log patterns and obvious best practices add unnecessary tokens.

Suggestions

Add explicit error handling and validation checkpoints to the workflow (e.g., what to do if attestation times out, how to handle failed redemptions, gas estimation checks before executing)

Remove or minimize console.log statements in code examples—Claude knows how to log; focus on the API calls and return types

Split the TypeScript API reference into a separate REFERENCE.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with chat commands and the transfer flow summary

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary verbosity—console.log statements in every code example add bulk without teaching Claude anything new, and the best practices section states obvious things like 'verify destination address.' The supported chains table and fee table are useful, but the overall document could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides fully executable TypeScript code with specific imports, function signatures, parameters, and return values. Chat commands are concrete and copy-paste ready. Both Wormhole and CCTP flows have complete working examples covering quote, execute, and redeem operations.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The transfer flows are listed (Wormhole 4-step, CCTP 3-step) and the code examples implicitly show the sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery steps. For a destructive financial operation (cross-chain token transfers), missing feedback loops for failed attestations, insufficient gas, or failed redemptions is a significant gap.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-structured with clear sections and tables, but it's a monolithic document (~180 lines) that could benefit from splitting the full API reference into a separate file. The chat commands, TypeScript API, and fee tables are all inline rather than appropriately distributed across files for a skill of this size.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
alsk1992/CloddsBot
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.