Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a clear reference for DEX market intelligence slash commands with good examples and organized sections. Its main weakness is that it's unclear whether these slash commands map to actual tool implementations or are just conceptual - there's no underlying API call structure, tool use specification, or code. The content is well-organized for a reference card but slightly verbose in places like the trigger phrase list.
Suggestions
Add concrete implementation details: show the actual DexScreener API endpoints being called (e.g., `https://api.dexscreener.com/latest/dex/tokens/{address}`) so Claude knows how to execute these commands
Trim the 'Use this skill when users ask about' section - Claude can infer intent from the command descriptions; a 1-2 line summary would suffice
Consider adding a brief example of the response format/output so Claude knows how to present the data back to users
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary verbosity - the long trigger phrase list ('Use this skill when users ask about') could be trimmed, and the filter table, while useful, is somewhat lengthy. The 'Data Available Per Token' section at the end is a simple list that earns its place, but overall there's room to tighten. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The commands are clearly specified with examples, which is good. However, these are slash commands for a custom tool/integration, and there's no indication of what actually happens under the hood - no API endpoints, no code, no tool definitions. If the slash commands are the interface, they're concrete enough, but there's no executable code or implementation detail showing how these commands resolve. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose skill (querying market data) with no destructive or multi-step operations. The commands are clearly organized into discovery vs. token-specific categories, and the examples make the usage unambiguous. No validation steps are needed for read-only data queries. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections (Discovery Commands, Token Data Commands, Data Available), but everything is inline in a single file. The filter table and extensive examples could potentially be split out for a cleaner overview. However, at ~80 lines it's borderline - not egregiously long but could benefit from better separation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |