CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

pairing

User pairing, authentication, and trust management

48

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/skills/bundled/pairing/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is highly actionable with copy-paste-ready code and commands across all surfaces, but it inlines an extensive API reference that should be split into a separate file, and the multi-step pairing workflow is presented as scattered API sections rather than one sequenced flow with validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Move the full TypeScript API reference into a separate file (e.g. references/API.md) and keep only a quick-start example inline, with a clearly signaled link.

Add one sequenced end-to-end workflow (create request -> validate code -> approve -> verify isPaired) with explicit validation checkpoints, especially before destructive calls like removePairing.

Trim the per-snippet console.log commentary to reduce tokens while keeping the executable code.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with well-labeled sections and compact tables, but it reproduces a long inline API reference (12+ TS snippets with console.log commentary) that pads tokens beyond what Claude needs.

3 / 5

Actionability

Every section provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready TypeScript, CLI, and chat-command examples that directly cover the common cases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The pairing flow (create request -> validate code -> approve/reject) is implied across separate API sections but is never sequenced into a single workflow, and there are no validation checkpoints despite destructive/batch operations like removePairing, so it caps at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is organized into clear sections, but a large inline TypeScript API reference that clearly belongs in a separate reference file is kept entirely in SKILL.md with no external references to split it out.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and names a coherent domain but stops at a high-level capability summary with no concrete actions and no explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance. Per the rubric, the missing trigger clause caps completeness, and the generic phrasing limits specificity and distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when pairing new users to Clodds, approving pairing requests, or managing trust levels.'

Replace the abstract summary with concrete actions the skill performs, e.g. 'Generate and validate pairing codes, approve/reject pairing requests, and grant owner or paired trust levels.'

Include user-natural synonyms and file/command cues (e.g. '/pair', 'pairing code', 'trust level') to improve trigger-term coverage and reduce conflict with generic auth skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"User pairing, authentication, and trust management" names the domain (pairing, authentication, trust) but lists no concrete actions; it names capabilities at a conceptual level rather than enumerating what the skill does.

3 / 5

Completeness

It conveys a clear 'what' (pairing, authentication, trust management) but has no 'when' / 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The only user-natural terms are "pairing" and "trust"; "authentication" is technical and there are no synonyms or concrete trigger phrases a user would naturally say, so it sits just below the midpoint.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"User pairing, authentication, and trust management" is somewhat specific to a niche but could still overlap with general auth/access skills, so it sits at the midpoint rather than clearly distinct.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

alsk1992/CloddsBot

Path

src/skills/bundled/pairing/SKILL.md

Revision

c930628

Reviewed

Table of Contents

DiscoveryImplementationValidation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.

Claim skill