Raydium - swaps, CLMM positions, AMM liquidity on Solana
61
52%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./src/skills/bundled/raydium/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
40%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a clear niche (Raydium DeFi operations on Solana) with domain-specific terminology, giving it good distinctiveness. However, it lacks a 'Use when...' clause entirely and the capabilities are listed as terse noun phrases rather than concrete action descriptions, significantly weakening completeness and specificity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to swap tokens on Raydium, manage concentrated liquidity (CLMM) positions, or add/remove AMM liquidity on Solana.'
Expand the capability descriptions into concrete actions, e.g., 'Execute token swaps, create and manage CLMM (concentrated liquidity) positions, and add or remove AMM liquidity pools on Raydium.'
Include additional natural trigger terms like 'DEX', 'liquidity pool', 'token swap', 'concentrated liquidity', and 'Solana DeFi' to improve keyword coverage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Raydium on Solana) and lists some actions (swaps, CLMM positions, AMM liquidity), but these are terse and not fully elaborated as concrete actions—they read more like feature categories than specific operations like 'create CLMM positions, add AMM liquidity, execute token swaps'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | The description answers 'what' at a high level but completely lacks any 'when' guidance—there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the rubric should cap completeness at 2, and since the 'what' is also quite thin, a score of 1 is appropriate. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant domain-specific keywords like 'Raydium', 'swaps', 'CLMM', 'AMM', 'liquidity', and 'Solana' that users familiar with DeFi would use. However, it misses common variations like 'swap tokens', 'liquidity pool', 'concentrated liquidity', 'DEX', or 'trading on Solana'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description is clearly scoped to Raydium on Solana with specific DeFi concepts (CLMM, AMM), making it highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with other skills unless there are multiple Solana DEX skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides strong actionability with concrete commands, tool mappings, and executable TypeScript examples covering Raydium's full feature set. However, it's somewhat verbose with explanatory content Claude doesn't need (pool type descriptions, basic DeFi concepts) and lacks validation/verification steps critical for financial operations. The content would benefit from being split into a concise overview with references to detailed API docs.
Suggestions
Add validation checkpoints for financial operations: verify transaction signatures, check balances before/after, handle slippage failures, and include error recovery guidance.
Remove the Pool Types table and CLMM Position Management conceptual sections—Claude already understands AMM/CLMM mechanics. Keep only tool-specific operational details.
Split the Tools Available tables and full TypeScript API reference into a separate REFERENCE.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with quick-start examples and links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary content like the Pool Types table explaining what AMM and CLMM are (Claude knows this), the CLMM Position Management section with basic DeFi concepts, and the Price Range Strategy table which is general DeFi knowledge rather than tool-specific guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable TypeScript code examples with real function signatures, concrete command syntax, specific parameter formats (lamports, slippage in bps), and copy-paste ready examples covering swaps, CLMM positions, and AMM liquidity operations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The CLMM Position Management section lists steps for opening/managing positions but lacks validation checkpoints. For financial operations involving real funds (swaps, liquidity provision), there are no explicit verification steps like checking transaction success, confirming balances, or error recovery flows. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably structured with clear sections (Commands, Examples, Tools, API), but it's a long monolithic file. The Tools Available tables and full TypeScript API reference could be split into separate reference files, with SKILL.md serving as a concise overview with links. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
e71a5f6
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.