Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a simple skill. The only notable gap is the absence of a validation/confirmation checkpoint around the destructive `/sandbox reset` operation.
Suggestions
Add a confirmation or pre-check before `/sandbox reset` (e.g. capture current state or prompt to confirm) since it destructively clears the canvas.
Note the expected server URL format or how to retrieve it after `/sandbox start` so the agent can act on the returned URL.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; commands, an env-var table, examples, and a short "How It Works" list each earn their place, matching the score-5 "Lean and efficient" anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and executable (`/sandbox start`, `/sandbox push <html>`, etc.) with copy-paste-ready examples covering the common cases, matching the score-5 fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "How It Works" section gives a clear 5-step sequence, but `/sandbox reset` clears all HTML/CSS/JS from the canvas, a destructive operation with no validation or confirmation step, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the destructive-operations guideline; it is not a 2 because the sequence itself is coherent and well-ordered. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no bundle files and no need for external references, yet is organized into clear sections (Commands, Environment Variables, Examples, How It Works), qualifying for the score-5 simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |