Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean orchestrator overview with clear entry logic and an explicit failure checkpoint, but it is entirely navigation: all operational content lives in referenced files, and none of those files are present in the bundle, leaving 11 dangling references. Bundled correctly it would score notably higher on progressive disclosure and actionability.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files (commands/*.md, skills/controller.md, guidelines.md) in the bundle so the one-level-deep references resolve.
Inline a one-line phase order (ingest > research > prototype > evaluate > handoff) so the workflow shape is visible even before opening controller.md.
Define 'escalate' concretely in the body (e.g. what to do or who/what to hand the failure to) since it is the sole recovery path offered.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~20-line body is pure instruction with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line directs behavior ('read its wrapper', 'read skills/controller.md', 'stop and report the error'). This matches anchor 5: lean, assumes competence, every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is directly executable for an orchestrator skill: named files to read per condition, the phase to execute per input type, and an explicit failure policy. Minor gaps keep it at 4 rather than 5: 'escalate' is undefined in the body and 'execute the first phase the user requests' leaves the phase set implicit, deferring all execution detail to referenced files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The entry decision tree is clearly sequenced (command invoked vs. controller load, Jira key vs. requested phase) and includes an explicit checkpoint with feedback loop ('If a step fails or produces unexpected output, stop and report... Do not advance... Offer to retry or escalate'). Not 5 because the actual phase progression and per-phase validation are externalized to controller.md and 'escalate' is not defined here. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | On paper the structure is ideal — a concise overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (eight command wrappers, controller, guidelines). However, per the rubric guideline to score against the actual bundle structure, the bundle contains no files at all: commands/*.md, skills/controller.md, and guidelines.md are all missing, so every reference is a dead link and the skill is unusable as bundled. This drops it to anchor 3 rather than 4-5. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |