CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

diagnose-acquisition

Diagnose where users come from, measure channel efficiency, identify organic vs. paid mix health, calculate CAC by segment, and find the highest-leverage acquisition channels. Use when a PM needs to understand acquisition economics, optimize channel mix, or figure out why growth is stalling at the top of the funnel.

74

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable analysis prompt with a clear multi-step sequence and quantitative guidance. Its main weakness is conciseness: it re-explains growth-economics concepts (CAC, LTV, K-factor, activation) that Claude already knows and could be tightened.

Suggestions

Trim definitional restatements of known growth concepts (e.g. 'True CAC = Spend / Activated Users', 'K > 1 means self-sustaining viral growth', 'Volume is vanity') — keep the formulas/thresholds but drop the prose explanations.

Collapse the repeated channel-classification taxonomy in Step 1 into a tighter reference table rather than narrating each type's marginal-cost behavior inline.

Consolidate the 'Tips' and 'Anti-plays' sections, which overlap in their 'don't optimize for vanity volume' guidance, to remove redundancy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient but padded with re-explanation of growth concepts Claude already knows — e.g. 'True CAC = Spend / Activated Users', 'K > 1 means self-sustaining viral growth', 'Volume is vanity' — and could be tightened, matching the score-2 anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance as a prompt template: exact table column schemas, formulas (K-factor = invites x acceptance rate), and quantitative thresholds (<2% B2B / <5% consumer signup conversion, >40% organic healthy, >60% paid fragile), so it is copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 5-step process (Decompose -> Measure Quality -> Assess Leverage -> Identify Bottlenecks -> Recommend) with a 7-item 'Deliver' output checklist; no validation feedback loops are needed for advisory analysis, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Single self-contained file with no bundle present; content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Prompt Template, Steps 1-5, Output Format, Tips) with no nested or broken references, appropriate for a cohesive analysis prompt.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and uses third-person voice with a clear 'Use when' trigger and natural keywords. It carves out a distinct acquisition-economics niche unlikely to collide with sibling growth skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions — 'Diagnose where users come from, measure channel efficiency, identify organic vs. paid mix health, calculate CAC by segment, and find the highest-leverage acquisition channels' — matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Diagnose... measure... identify... calculate...') and when via the explicit 'Use when a PM needs to understand acquisition economics...' trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing terms are well covered: 'where users come from', 'channel mix', 'organic vs. paid', 'CAC', 'growth is stalling at the top of the funnel', all phrased as a user would say them.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear acquisition-diagnosis niche with distinct top-of-funnel/CAC triggers, and even distinguishes itself from adjacent skills like activation, making wrong-skill triggering unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
amplitude/builder-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.