Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear, well-sequenced five-step workflow with explicit inputs/outputs, optional branches, and well-signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files. Its main weaknesses are missing validation checkpoints, no executable command invocations, redundant workflow restatements, and a few orphaned bundle files that are never linked.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps after each generation stage (e.g., verify the output image is ≥1080×1920 and the wav is 16kHz mono before moving to video composition), with a fix-and-retry loop.
Show at least one concrete executable invocation per script with its arguments (e.g., `python scripts/generate_character.py --prompt "..." --aspect_ratio 9:16 --resolution 1080x1920`) so the guidance is copy-paste runnable.
Cut the redundant restatements — replace 使用示例-示例1 and the 工作流总结 ASCII diagram with pointers to a single workflow description, and drop the 前置知识 section's explanations of basic AI/TTS/video principles.
Link the orphaned bundle files (references/script-templates.md, references/visual-styles.md, assets/templates/*.md) from the 资源索引 with when-to-read annotations so they are discoverable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly operational, but "前置知识" makes Claude review basic principles of AI painting, speech synthesis, and video generation that it already knows, and the workflow is restated three times (操作步骤, 使用示例-示例1, 工作流总结 ASCII diagram) with key parameters (1080×1920, 16kHz) repeated many times. Not score 2 because the padding is confined to a few sections rather than pervasive; not score 4 because the redundant restatements are a clear trim target. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps name real scripts and reference files with defined inputs/outputs, but no actual command invocation with arguments is ever shown (e.g., no `python scripts/generate_character.py ...` line), and the scripts themselves contain TODO pseudocode rather than executable calls. Not score 2 because the per-step I/O contracts and file pointers are concrete; not score 4 because the guidance cannot be executed as written. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The image→audio→video sequence is explicit with per-step inputs, outputs, and optional branches, but validation checkpoints are entirely absent (e.g., no step verifies the generated image is actually ≥1080×1920 or that the wav is 16kHz mono before proceeding). This matches the anchor 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'; not score 4 because the validation gap is not minor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with one-level-deep references explicitly annotated with "何时读取" (when to read) and scripts linked per step — references/script-templates.md, references/visual-styles.md, and assets/templates/*.md exist in the bundle but are never referenced from the body, leaving them undiscoverable. Not score 5 because of these orphaned bundle files; not score 3 because the structure and signaling are otherwise good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |