Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly structured, highly actionable authoring-and-delivery workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops, plus well-gated one-level-deep references. It is slightly verbose in the authoring-invariants prose and cannot be verified against the absent bundle files.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Authoring invariants' bullet list—convert some of the longest prose specifications into shorter rules or move deep geometry details (e.g. Port Spread axis/offset rules) into references/authoring-contract.md to lift conciseness.
Ensure every referenced path (references/authoring-contract.md, references/viewer-runtime.md, references/delivery-contract.md, renderers/workflow/README.md) resolves to a real bundle file so the progressive-disclosure structure is fully verifiable.
Consider moving the detailed per-type field enums and routing-control rules into a single reference table so the main body stays a lean overview that points to specifics.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient and information-dense—concrete commands and exact thresholds rather than concept explanation—but the 'Authoring invariants' section is long and a few prose specifications could be tightened, landing just below the leanest anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact commands with flags ('node bin/archify.mjs validate <type> <candidate.json> --quality showcase --json'), specific field names, exact viewport sizes, and exit-code semantics covering the common authoring and delivery cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Fast authoring path is a clear 1–5 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('Validate after every candidate edit and immediately before handoff'), showcase acceptance criteria, a fix–rerun feedback loop, and a stop condition ('If two consecutive rounds do not improve that best count, stop and report'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep, conditionally gated references (e.g. 'Read references/viewer-runtime.md only when the user explicitly asks...'), but the referenced bundle files (references/, renderers/) are not present to verify they exist and are well-organized, holding this just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |