Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow with good progressive disclosure and appropriately split reference files. The main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/retry feedback loop for what is inherently a batch image-generation operation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/retry step for failed image generations (e.g., 'if generation fails, retry up to N times; if still failing, skip and report in the summary') to satisfy the batch-operation feedback-loop requirement.
Consolidate the overlapping guidance between 步骤二 (分析配图需求) and 配图策略 (识别关键位置/优先级排序) to remove redundancy and tighten token use.
Specify how the image-generation capability is invoked (e.g., tool name or model call) so the generate step is fully executable rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and assumes Claude's competence; all guidance is domain-specific (illustration strategy) rather than concepts Claude already knows, though '步骤二' and '配图策略' overlap somewhat and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable rules — file naming (illustration-[slug].png with examples), insertion Markdown syntax with alt-text length, imgs/ save location, 16:9 ratio, and structured plan/summary templates — with only minor gaps around the actual generation invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are clearly sequenced with progress output and a failure summary, but this batch operation lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the batch-operations rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to real files (references/style-guide.md, references/terminology.md) in 资源索引; minor gaps as some inline strategy detail could be slimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |