CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bedtime-story

内容创作者在需要哄睡3-12岁儿童或制作睡前音频内容时,可一键生成20个精选故事列表,或直接讲解指定寓言与成语。以0.6倍舒缓语速和亲切语气自动营造温馨哄睡氛围,轻松搞定高质量睡前陪伴。

59

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/bedtime-story/bedtime-story/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow and properly split reference files. Its chief weakness is redundancy — repeated speed/completeness directives and a 注意事项 section that restates earlier steps.

Suggestions

State the global constraints (语速0.6倍, 全文讲解不精炼不删减, 亲切温馨) once in 语气与表达规范 and remove their repetition in 操作步骤 and 注意事项.

Collapse 注意事项 into 操作步骤 or trim it to only net-new constraints to avoid restating the workflow.

Add a short validation step for edge cases: invalid/out-of-range story numbers and unknown story or idiom names (ask the user to re-pick from the list).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

It assumes Claude's competence (no concept explanations) but repeats guidance noticeably — '语速0.6倍' appears four times, '全文讲解,不精炼,不删减' twice, and the 注意事项 section largely restates 操作步骤, so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout — fixed list format (序号+故事名称+出处), exact opening/closing lines, 0.6x speed, multi-select 'N、N'/'N,N' handling, and worked dialogue examples — with only minor gaps (e.g. behavior when a requested story is not found).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-step sequence (需求识别→列表生成→选择确认→故事讲解→成语讲解) with a regeneration feedback loop on '不喜欢', but explicit validation for invalid inputs (out-of-range number, unknown story) is missing, so it is not a 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (story-collection.md and tone-guide.md, both present and described), though the inline 使用示例 section makes the body somewhat long for an overview, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and when to use it within a distinct, well-scoped niche. Its main weaknesses are the absence of natural user trigger phrases and a touch of marketing fluff at the end.

Suggestions

Replace the situational 'when' framing with concrete user utterance triggers, e.g. add 'Use when the user says 我要听故事, asks for a 睡前故事, or names a fable/idiom.'

Drop the over-claim tail '轻松搞定高质量睡前陪伴' to tighten the description and avoid fluff.

Include the phrase '睡前故事' verbatim so the most common natural keyword is present.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — '一键生成20个精选故事列表', '直接讲解指定寓言与成语', '0.6倍舒缓语速' — but the trailing '轻松搞定高质量睡前陪伴' is mild over-claim fluff, keeping it just below comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (generate list, narrate fables/idioms, control tone/speed) and an explicit 'when' clause ('内容创作者在需要哄睡3-12岁儿童或制作睡前音频内容时') are present, but the when lacks concrete trigger phrases, so it is not a 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords appear ('故事', '寓言', '成语', '睡前', '哄睡') but the natural user utterances from the body ('我要听故事', '讲个故事', '睡前故事') are absent, so common variations are missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (bedtime storytelling for 3-12 year-olds via fables/idioms at 0.6x speed) with minimal conflict risk; only minor overlap with general storytelling or education skills keeps it from a 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anbeime/skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.