contract-review
Contract review skill that adds comment-based issue annotations without changing original text. Enforces a three-layer review (basic, business, legal), writes structured comments (issue type, risk reason, revision suggestion) with risk level encoded via reviewer name, and generates a contract summary, consolidated opinion, and Mermaid business flowchart (with rendered image). Output language must follow the contract’s language.
56
62%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/legal-assistant-skills-main/contract-review/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required runtime workflow reads outsider-authored free text from the contract .docx itself (parsed via `pandoc` in `scripts/contract_analyzer.py:extract_text()` and via `word/document.xml` in `scripts/document.py`), which then gets embedded into the generated LLM-*context* text fields (summary/opinion/flowchart/comment bodies) that the workflow uses downstream.
- Repository
- anbeime/skill
- Commit
f595e96
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.