Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation/feedback loops, and well-structured progressive disclosure to real bundle files. Its main weakness is redundancy — the 注意事项 and 使用示例 sections repeat material already present in the workflow and examples.
Suggestions
Remove or compress the 注意事项 section, which restates the prompt formula and consistency rules already given in the workflow steps.
Shorten 使用示例 to reference the existing workflow rather than re-listing all five steps per scenario.
Consolidate the repeated per-scene JSON schemas into a single canonical schema to reduce token overhead.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the 注意事项 and 使用示例 sections restate the prompt formula, consistency principles, and workflow steps already covered, and the large repeated JSON schemas add padding that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete prompt formula, copy-paste-ready JSON output schemas, an explicit quality checklist, and a fully worked example with real Chinese/English prompt text covering three scenarios. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint (步骤3 quality check pass/fail) and a feedback loop (不通过反馈, max 2 retries) for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to six real reference files and one asset, each with a clear '何时读取' navigation hint, all verified to exist, with content appropriately split one level deep. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |