Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with clear workflows and properly signaled, existing reference files, but it is notably verbose because the same guidance is repeated across four sections. Consolidating the duplicated structure, template, and prompt sections would materially improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Merge the redundant 智能体提示词 section into 操作步骤, or move it into a reference file, since it restates the same four-paragraph structure, emoji rules, and format requirements.
Remove the duplicate quality criteria by keeping a single 质量标准 checklist and deleting the parallel lists embedded in 使用示例/文案结构模板.
Move the full 文案结构模板 and per-category examples into copywriting_templates.md, keeping only the concise template skeleton inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The same four-paragraph structure, emoji rules, format requirements, and quality criteria are restated across 操作步骤, 质量标准, 文案结构模板, and 智能体提示词, creating several padded, duplicative sections. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete structural guidance, an explicit output template, emoji percentage targets (10%-20%), and three worked examples with real sample titles, though guidance is instruction-based rather than copy-paste code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both flows (文案生成, 文案优化) are clearly numbered and sequenced, with a 质量标准 section serving as a checkpoint checklist; minor validation gaps exist but no destructive/batch operations require hard validation caps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Three real one-level-deep references (copywriting_templates.md, copywriting_guide.md, emoji_library.md) are listed in a clearly signaled 资源索引 section with stated purposes; minor gap is the substantial inline content that duplicates reference material. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |