Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and code for every flow, but it is verbose with redundant CLI listings, omits validation checkpoints for batch and irreversible (代发) operations, and inlines everything into one monolithic file with no progressive disclosure to bundle files.
Suggestions
Add validation checkpoints before irreversible/batch steps — e.g., require confirm/dry-run before `fulfill` and a verify step after `publish` — to lift workflow clarity above the batch cap.
Move the scoring-model tables, CLI command reference, and Python API examples into separate reference files (e.g., SCORING.md, CLI.md, API.md) and link to them from a leaner SKILL.md.
De-duplicate the CLI commands: keep them in one place (the reference table) and reference it from the workflow steps rather than restating each command in prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~225-line body is mostly operational with little concept-over-explanation, but it repeats the same CLI commands three ways (操作步骤 prose, CLI 命令一览 table, Python API 调用) and inlines reference material that could be tightened, fitting the score-3 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands for every flow plus concrete Python API examples with realistic parameters and imports, covering the common cases per the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear (流程二 enumerates 采集→清洗→上架→推广→视频 with commands), but batch scraping/publishing and the irreversible 一键代发 ordering step lack validation checkpoints; per the rubric's destructive/batch cap this holds at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are headed and reasonably organized, but no bundle files exist and all reference-style content (CLI table, scoring-model tables, Python API, project structure) is inlined in one long document, matching the score-3 anchor of inline content that should be split. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |